ArticleCureus2024
Assessing the Histological Malignancy Grade of Olfactory Neuroblastoma Using the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare malignant tumor of the upper nasal cavity. The Hyams classification is an important histological grading system for diagnosing recurrence and predicting survival in ONB. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis in distinguishing between high-grade and low-grade ONB based on the Hyams classification system. Methods This retrospective study included 17 patients (11 males, six females; mean age 54 years, range 29-84) diagnosed with ONB who underwent pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging between December 2017 and September 2022. Two board-certified radiologists outlined the regions of interest on ADC maps of the tumors. Mean, minimum, maximum ADC, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy were calculated from the ADC histograms. Patients were divided into low-grade (Hyams I-II) and high-grade (Hyams III-IV) groups based on histopathological evaluation by a board-certified pathologist. ADC histogram parameters were compared between the two groups using Mann-Whitney U tests. Two-sided p-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results The study included 10 low-grade (two grade I, eight grade II) and seven high-grade (five grade III, one grade III/IV, one grade IV) ONB cases. Comparison between the low-grade and high-grade groups showed no statistically significant differences in any of the ADC histogram parameters analyzed: mean ADC (median 1.02 vs 0.95; p = 0.591), minimum ADC (0.84 vs 0.78; p = 0.494), maximum ADC (1.06 vs 1.19; p = 0.625), standard deviation (0.09 vs 0.14; p = 0.433), skewness (-0.48 vs -0.75; p = 0.133), kurtosis (2.79 vs 3.12; p = 0.161), and entropy (4.69 vs 5.06; p = 0.315). Conclusion This study demonstrated that ADC histogram analysis was unable to differentiate between high-grade and low-grade ONB based on the Hyams classification. The findings suggest that preoperative grading of ONB malignancy using ADC histogram parameters is challenging. Thus, grading based on preoperative imaging evaluation is difficult.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.