ArticleCureus2024
High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in Cervical and Endometrial Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study From a Tertiary Cancer Center in the UAE.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose This study evaluates the therapeutic outcomes and practical application of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in managing cervical and endometrial cancers at a tertiary hospital in the UAE, focusing on treatment efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 368 female patients treated between January 2008 and January 2022. Data included demographic information, cancer type, histopathology, treatment details, and survival outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results The cohort comprised 275 cervical cancer patients (74.73%) and 93 endometrial cancer patients (25.27%). The majority were non-nationals (79.62%). The mean age was 57 years. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histopathological type (63.59%). HDR brachytherapy was administered to 290 patients (79.89%). The 12-month survival probability was significantly higher in the HDR-Brachy group (75%, 95% CI: 60% to 85%) compared to the noHDR-Brachy group (50%, 95% CI: 35% to 65%), with a hazard ratio of 0.953 (p=0.0035). At the last review, 86.68% of patients were alive, and disease progression was observed in 37.88% of patients. Conclusion HDR brachytherapy significantly improves survival outcomes in cervical and endometrial cancer patients. Continued efforts to enhance access and standardize brachytherapy protocols are essential to optimize treatment efficacy and patient outcomes in similar healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.