ReviewCureus2024
Outcomes of Different Surgical Interventions for Treating Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Acupuncture Produce Durable Analgesia in Trigeminal Neuralgia? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Secondary trigeminal neuralgia caused by vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia treated with flow-diverting stent reconstruction: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Precise balloon pressure regulation in percutaneous balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia: evidence from a single-center prospective cohort.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating condition characterized by severe facial pain. Various surgical interventions are employed to manage this condition, including microvascular decompression (MVD), percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy (PRR), glycerol rhizotomy, percutaneous balloon compression (PBC), and stereotactic radiosurgery such as Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). This review synthesizes the outcomes of these interventions to provide an understanding of their efficacy and associated risks. MVD, known for its high initial relief rates, shows substantial long-term effectiveness, with recurrence rates varying based on patient demographics and comorbidities. GKRS offers significant pain relief with a favorable adverse event profile; however, recurrence rates increase over time, necessitating repeat procedures for sustained efficacy. PBC demonstrates high initial success, but pain recurrence is common, especially in patients with atypical TN. PRR provides immediate relief with a manageable recurrence rate and is particularly suitable for elderly patients and those with comorbidities. Glycerol rhizotomy, a cost-effective procedure, yields comparable outcomes to other interventions but requires careful patient selection. This review highlights the importance of tailored treatment approaches based on individual patient profiles, emphasizing the need for precise diagnostic criteria and careful patient selection to optimize outcomes. Long-term follow-up and the potential for repeat interventions are critical considerations in managing TN surgically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.