Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39262521›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Seaweeds and Their Secondary Metabolites: A Promising Drug Candidate With Novel Mechanisms Against Cancers and Tumor Angiogenesis.

Taniya Mary Martin, Meenakshi Sundaram K

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Taniya Mary MartinZebrafish Facility, Department of Anatomy, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS) Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Meenakshi Sundaram KZebrafish Facility, Department of Anatomy, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS) Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer continually remains a severe threat to public health and requires constant demand for novel therapeutic drug candidates. Due to their multi-target orientation, lesser toxicity, and easy availability, natural compounds attract more attention from current scientific research interest than synthetic drug molecules. The plants and microorganisms produce a huge variety of secondary metabolites because of their physiological diversification, and the seaweeds occupy a prominent position as effective drug resources. Seaweeds comprise microscopic or macroscopic photosynthetic, multicellular, eukaryotic marine algae that commonly inhabit the coastal regions. Several molecules (such as polysaccharides, lipids, proteinaceous fractions, phenolic compounds, and alkaloids) are derived from seaweeds, and those small molecules are well attractive and more effective in cancer research programs. Their structural variation, derivative diversity, and quantity vary with seaweed species and geographical origin. Their smaller molecular weight, unique derivatives, hydrophobicity, and degree of sulfation are reported to be causes of their crucial role against different cancer cells in vitro. Several reports showed that those compounds selectively discriminate between normal and cancer cells based on receptor variations, enzyme deficiency, and structural properties. The present review aimed to give a concise explanation regarding their structural diversity, extractability, and mechanism of action related to their anti-cancer activities based on recently published data.

Indexed as

anticancercytotoxicityepigeneticspolyphenolsseaweedsecondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID39262521
PMCPMC11387980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.