Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39262517›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Tracking Lymphatic Drainage Pathways Through Inner Ear Channels: A Systematic Review.

Surraj Susai, Rohini Motwani, Mrudula Chandrupatla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Surraj SusaiDepartment of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, IND.
Rohini MotwaniDepartment of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, IND.
Mrudula ChandrupatlaDepartment of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for potential lymphatic routes through the cochlea, or membranous portions of the inner ear labyrinth, remains a significant challenge. Researchers often focus on lower mammals rather than humans to uncover these pathways. This review aims to delineate the speculated lymphatic routes within the inner ear to date. It follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, conducting a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Crossref, and Google databases using the terms "inner ear" and "lymph." The problem, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) search strategy was employed, and analysis was performed using equation and scope metrics. Articles were screened and filtered using the CADIMA automation tool, resulting in 33 articles being reviewed, of which 23 were selected. Potential lymphatic drainage routes identified include the round window, oval window, scala tympani, spiral limbus, and lateral wall of the cochlea. The vestibular side of Reissner's membrane was noted as a key nodal point for lymphocytes within the inner ear. This review maps the proposed lymphatic networks in the inner ear and highlights existing gaps. It systematically gathers, evaluates, and synthesizes available evidence on the lymphatic pathways of the inner ear, offering valuable insights into their presence, structure, function, and clinical significance.

Indexed as

cochlealacunalymphnetworkvestibule

Identifiers

PMID39262517
PMCPMC11390144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.