ArticleCureus2024
A Novel Treatment for Skin Manifestations in Dermatomyositis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies-Treatment Perspective of Highly Specialised Rheumatology Centre.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Improvement in dermatomyositis-associated muscle disease with anifrolumab.The British journal of dermatology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of anifrolumab on skin, joint and lung involvement in anti-MDA5 positive dermatomyositis: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a case of refractory cutaneous dermatomyositis (DM) in a 51-year-old Hispanic female which failed multiple treatments but found symptomatic relief with anifrolumab. Anifrolumab was the only treatment that was associated with significant improvement in the rash and pruritis of the patient and lowered her corticosteroid needs. To our knowledge, this is the only second case report that has shown success in treating refractory cutaneous symptoms of DM with anifrolumab after failing standard and multiple combinations of therapies. Anifrolumab is a new first-in-class human monoclonal antibody, which inhibits type 1 interferon receptor (IFN-1) and is used to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It is FDA-approved for non-renal manifestations of SLE. This IFN pathway seems to be also active in patients with DM. The presence of IFN-1 and IFN-2 has been reported in muscle biopsies of patients with inflammatory myopathies. Moreover, the IFN activation signature is present in the muscle, blood, and skin of patients with DM. IFN-1 has been assumed to activate toll-like receptors which activate the dendritic cells leading to the secretion of cytokines and chemokines. This potential pathophysiological role of IFN in DM may explain the symptom improvement experienced by our patient after starting anifrolumab treatment. Anifrolumab has additionally been shown to have a good safety profile when used to treat patients with SLE with up to three years of treatment on background conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapies. In conclusion, SLE and DM share similarities in their pathophysiology and cutaneous disease involvement and can be differentiated clinically. Skin manifestations of DM can persist despite combinations of therapies even when weakness resolves. With this case report, we aim to highlight the possibility of utilizing anifrolumab for treating DM skin manifestations, especially in refractory cases. More research is needed to guide where anifrolumab stands in the therapeutic algorithm for DM. It is unknown whether it treats the myositis component, DM-related arthritis, or coexistent rheumatoid arthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.