Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39262452›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

COVID-19 diagnosis, vaccination during pregnancy, and adverse pregnancy outcomes of 865,654 women in England and Wales: a population-based cohort study.

Elena Raffetti, Thomas Bolton, John Nolan, Luisa Zuccolo, Rachel Denholm, Gordon Smith, Ashley Akbari, Katie Harron, Gwenetta Curry, Elias Allara and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neonatal and Infant Health Outcomes Following Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination: CDC's COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Elena RaffettiBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Thomas BoltonBritish Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, UK.
John NolanBritish Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, UK.
Luisa ZuccoloHealth Data Science Centre, Human Technopole, Milan, Italy.
Rachel DenholmPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gordon SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ashley AkbariPopulation Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Katie HarronPopulation, Policy & Practice Dept UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Gwenetta CurryEdinburgh Migration and Ethnicity Health Research Group, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Elias AllaraBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Deborah A LawlorMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Massimo CaputoTranslational Health Science, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Hoda AbbasizanjaniPopulation Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Tim ChicoDivision of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, UK.
Angela M WoodBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium and the Longitudinal Health and Wellbeing COVID-19 National Core Study

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/17/1/32804Medical Research Council MC_PC_20058Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/5Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The extent to which COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination during pregnancy are associated with risks of common and rare adverse pregnancy outcomes remains uncertain. We compared the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with and without COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination during pregnancy. Methods: We studied population-scale linked electronic health records for women with singleton pregnancies in England and Wales from 1 August 2019 to 31 December 2021. This time period was divided at 8th December 2020 into pre-vaccination and vaccination roll-out eras. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for common and rare pregnancy outcomes according to the time since COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination and by pregnancy trimester and COVID-19 variant. Findings: Amongst 865,654 pregnant women, we recorded 60,134 (7%) COVID-19 diagnoses and 182,120 (21%) adverse pregnancy outcomes. COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of gestational diabetes (adjusted HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.18-1.26), gestational hypertension (1.16, 1.10-1.22), pre-eclampsia (1.20, 1.12-1.28), preterm birth (1.63, 1.57-1.69, and 1.68, 1.61-1.75 for spontaneous preterm), very preterm birth (2.04, 1.86-2.23), small for gestational age (1.12, 1.07-1.18), thrombotic venous events (1.85, 1.56-2.20) and stillbirth (only within 14-days since COVID-19 diagnosis, 3.39, 2.23-5.15). HRs were more pronounced in the pre-vaccination era, within 14-days since COVID-19 diagnosis, when COVID-19 diagnosis occurred in the 3rd trimester, and in the original variant era. There was no evidence to suggest COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Instead, dose 1 of COVID-19 vaccine was associated with lower risks of preterm birth (0.90, 0.86-0.95), very preterm birth (0.84, 0.76-0.94), small for gestational age (0.93, 0.88-0.99), and stillbirth (0.67, 0.49-0.92). Interpretation: Pregnant women with a COVID-19 diagnosis have higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings support recommendations towards high-priority vaccination against COVID-19 in pregnant women. Funding: BHF, ESRC, Forte, HDR-UK, MRC, NIHR and VR.

Indexed as

Adverse pregnancy outcomesCOVID-19COVID-19 variantsTrimesterVaccination

Identifiers

PMID39262452
PMCPMC11388188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.