ArticleBiology methods & protocols2024
NanoMGT: Marker gene typing of low complexity mono-species metagenomic samples using noisy long reads.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid advancements in sequencing technologies have led to significant progress in microbial genomics, yet challenges persist in accurately identifying microbial strain diversity in metagenomic samples, especially when working with noisy long-read data from platforms like Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). In this article, we introduce NanoMGT, a tool designed to enhance marker gene typing in low-complexity mono-species samples, leveraging the unique properties of long reads. NanoMGT excels in its ability to accurately identify mutations amidst high error rates, ensuring the reliable detection of multiple strain-specific marker genes. Our tool implements a novel scoring system that rewards mutations co-occurring across different reads and penalizes densely grouped, likely erroneous variants, thereby achieving a good balance between sensitivity and precision. A comparative evaluation of NanoMGT, using a simulated multi-strain sample of seven bacterial species, demonstrated superior performance relative to existing tools and the advantages of using a threshold-based filtering approach to calling minority variants in ONT's sequencing data. NanoMGT's potential as a post-binning tool in metagenomic pipelines is particularly notable, enabling researchers to more accurately determine specific alleles and understand strain diversity in microbial communities. Our findings have significant implications for clinical diagnostics, environmental microbiology, and the broader field of genomics. The findings offer a reliable and efficient approach to marker gene typing in complex metagenomic samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.