Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39262322›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical investigation2025

Catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: Where are we at and where are we going? Updates and ongoing unmet clinical needs.

Laura Girardi, Marcello Di Nisio, Matteo Candeloro, Emanuele Valeriani, Walter Ageno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Risk Factors for Catheter-Related Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Comprehensive Review of Catheter-Related Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Incidence and Timing of Venous Thromboembolism After Implantable Port Placement in Cancer Patients: A Single-Centre Cohort Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura GirardiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1350-4783
Marcello Di NisioDepartment of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Matteo CandeloroDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.
Emanuele ValerianiDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Specialty, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9729-3214
Walter AgenoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is one of the major complications affecting patients with indwelling venous catheters, usually involving the upper extremity deep venous system. This condition can lead to potentially life-threatening complications such as pulmonary embolism and sepsis. The risk of developing CRT varies depending on type of catheters and patient characteristics. Despite advances in materials and technologies, the actual incidence of CRT is still considerable. Available evidence on CRT management remains controversial, and clinical guidelines base their recommendations on data from non-catheter related upper extremity or lower extremity deep venous thromboses.

aimsThis narrative review aims to describe the epidemiology of CRT, to review the available evidence on its management and to highlight the current unmet needs.

methodsNo formal search strategy was applied for the revision of the literature. The main sources of information used were Medline and guidelines from international societies. CONTENT: The management of CRT requires a careful balance between the risk of thrombus progression, recurrent events, and systemic embolization and the increased bleeding risk in often fragile patients. Open issues include the optimal management of the catheter and the type and duration of anticoagulant therapy. Direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly prescribed, representing an important alternative to the standard of care low molecular weight heparins in selected cases. The development of new anticoagulant drugs such as factors XI and XII inhibitors may offer further advantages in this context.

conclusionsThe management of CRT is still challenging with constant need for updated evidence to support tailored approaches.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsVenous ThrombosisCatheterization, Central VenousCatheters, IndwellingHumansUpper Extremity Deep Vein ThrombosisAnticoagulantsanticoagulant treatmentscatheter‐related venous thrombosiscentral venous cathetersupper extremity deep vein thrombosisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID39262322
PMCPMC11628654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.