ReviewEuropean journal of clinical investigation2025
Catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: Where are we at and where are we going? Updates and ongoing unmet clinical needs.
Review in European journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for central venous catheter-related complications in children: a systematic review.BMC pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative safety and effectiveness of midline catheters vs. peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Personalized Anticoagulation in Cancer Patients: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Potential Role of Contact Pathway Factors in Catheter-Related Thrombosis: Emerging Evidence and Therapeutic Strategies.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Risk Factors for Catheter-Related Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Analysis of risk factors and prognostic differences in hospital-acquired thrombosis between very preterm infants and moderate to late preterm infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Incidence and risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis in elderly patients with malignant tumors: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: Where are we at and where are we going? Updates and ongoing unmet clinical needs.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Catheter-Related Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Incidence and Timing of Venous Thromboembolism After Implantable Port Placement in Cancer Patients: A Single-Centre Cohort Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCatheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is one of the major complications affecting patients with indwelling venous catheters, usually involving the upper extremity deep venous system. This condition can lead to potentially life-threatening complications such as pulmonary embolism and sepsis. The risk of developing CRT varies depending on type of catheters and patient characteristics. Despite advances in materials and technologies, the actual incidence of CRT is still considerable. Available evidence on CRT management remains controversial, and clinical guidelines base their recommendations on data from non-catheter related upper extremity or lower extremity deep venous thromboses.
aimsThis narrative review aims to describe the epidemiology of CRT, to review the available evidence on its management and to highlight the current unmet needs.
methodsNo formal search strategy was applied for the revision of the literature. The main sources of information used were Medline and guidelines from international societies. CONTENT: The management of CRT requires a careful balance between the risk of thrombus progression, recurrent events, and systemic embolization and the increased bleeding risk in often fragile patients. Open issues include the optimal management of the catheter and the type and duration of anticoagulant therapy. Direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly prescribed, representing an important alternative to the standard of care low molecular weight heparins in selected cases. The development of new anticoagulant drugs such as factors XI and XII inhibitors may offer further advantages in this context.
conclusionsThe management of CRT is still challenging with constant need for updated evidence to support tailored approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.