Observational studyScandinavian journal of primary health care2025
Self-injurious thoughts and behaviours as the reason for contact to Norwegian emergency primary care centres: an observational study.
Observational study in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe and compare contacts regarding self-injurious thoughts and behaviours to other contacts to emergency primary care.
designObservational study.
settingA sentinel network of seven emergency primary care centres throughout Norway. SUBJECTS: Initial contacts regarding patients 10 years and older during 12 consecutive months (11/2021-10/2022).
main outcome measuresContacts due to self-injurious thoughts and behaviours.
resultsSelf-injurious thoughts and behaviours were the reason for contact for 0.6% (
conclusionSelf-injurious thoughts and behaviours are rare reasons for contact to emergency primary care but are assessed as more urgent than other contact reasons and trigger more extensive medical help. Many of the patients are known to the service through a history of similar contacts. IMPLICATIONS: The infrequency and severity of these encounters might necessitate training, decision support and procedures to compensate for the health care personnel's limited exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.