Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39262118›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2024

The Use of Single-Use Medical Gloves in Doctors' Practices and Hospitals.

Tobias Siegfried Kramer, Annika Brodzinski, Marco Paul, Hans Drexler, Simone Scheithauer, Christine Geffers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unacceptable From an Occupational Medicine Perspective.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Article
  2. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tobias Siegfried KramerInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité -University Medicine Berlin, Germany; National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Germany; LADR Laboratory Group Dr Kramer & Colleagues, Geesthacht, Germany; Clean Hands Campaign,-University Medicine Berlin, Germany; Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen; Institute for Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Annika Brodzinski
Marco Paul
Hans Drexler
Simone Scheithauer
Christine Geffers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-use medical gloves achieve their purpose only when properly used. Proper use also helps avoid undesired consequences such as excessive waste and CO2 emissions, as well as inadequate hand hygiene.

methodsIn this selective review of the primary scientific literature, we summarize the current state of knowledge on the use of singleuse medical gloves in the health-care sector. We also provide further information from national recommendations, guidelines, and regulatory provisions.

resultsSingle-use medical gloves mainly serve to protect the health-care professional and are only rarely meant to promote patient safety. For reasons of occupational safety and self-protection, hand hygiene should be performed after single-use medical gloves are removed. In a study of opened glove boxes, human pathogenic bacteria were detected on around 13% of single-use medical gloves. A meta-analysis found that wearing single-use medical gloves can lower the risk of nosocomial infection (incidence rate ratio, IRR: 0.77 [0.67; 0.89]. In a randomized controlled trial, adherence for putting on single-use medical gloves without prior hand disinfection was 87%. On the other hand, where hand disinfection was expected to be performed before putting on gloves, adherence was 41%. Proper use can lower the rate of occupational skin diseases and improve adherence to hand hygiene for the five moments in which it is recommended (before and after patient contact, before aseptic procedures, after contact with potentially infectious material, and after contact with the immediate patient environment).

conclusionLimiting the use of single-use medical gloves to its proper indications promotes the safety of health-care professionals and patients and has beneficial ecological and economic effects as well.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionDisposable EquipmentGloves, ProtectiveGloves, SurgicalPractice Patterns, Physicians'GermanyHand DisinfectionHand HygieneHumans

Identifiers

PMID39262118
PMCPMC12005385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.