Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Enhancing total knee arthroplasty outcomes: the role of individualized femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted surgery - A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Femoral component sagittal alignment and its influence on short-term outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Influence of total knee arthroplasty on coronal plane phenotypes and associated clinical outcomes: a CPAK-based comparison between mechanical and functional alignment.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Sagittal femoral morphology is not associated with coronal alignment phenotypes: A radiographic analysis from the Brescia Knee Research Group.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Unrestricted kinematic alignment on the sagittal plane: Posterior tibial slope and combined flexion do not have boundaries to respect in terms of short-term clinical outcomes and safety.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Effect of sagittal alignment on patient outcomes following total knee replacement: A systematic review and correlation analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Robot-assisted total vs. unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Turkish journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Beyond the CPAK dogma: robotic FA preserves CPAK better than MA but with equivalent proms at 5-year follow-up.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty-Part 2: Combined flexion does not affect outcomes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty-Part 1: Variations in tibial slope and distal femoral flexion do not affect outcomes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Current developments in robotic assistance technology for total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive overview.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOptimal sagittal alignment of the femoral prosthesis is critical to the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While robotic-assisted TKA can improve alignment accuracy, the efficacy of default femoral alignment versus individualized alignment remains under scrutiny. This study aimed to compare the differences in prosthetic alignment, anatomical restoration, and clinical outcomes between individualized femoral sagittal alignment and default sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted TKA.
methodsIn a prospective randomised controlled trial, 113 patients (120 knees) underwent robotic-assisted TKA were divided into two groups: 61 with individualized femoral flexion (individualized alignment group) and 59 with default 3-5° flexion (default alignment group). The individualized alignment was based on the distal femoral sagittal anteverted angle (DFSAA), defined as the angle between the mechanical and distal anatomical axes of the femur. The radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared.
resultsDespite similar postoperative femoral flexion angles between groups (P = 0.748), the individualized alignment group exhibited significantly lower incidences of femoral prosthesis extension and higher rates of optimal 0-3° prosthesis flexion (9.8% vs. 27.1%, P = 0.014,78.7% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.008, respectively). The individualized alignment group also demonstrated more favourable changes in sagittal anatomy, with higher maintenance of postoperative anterior femoral offset within 1 mm (54.1% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.026) and posterior condylar offset within 1 mm and 2 mm (44.3% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.031,73.8% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.010, respectively). Although slight improvement in the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) at three months was observed (P = 0.045), it did not reach a minimal clinically important difference.
conclusionIndividualized tailoring of femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) enhances prosthetic alignment and anatomical restoration, suggesting potential improvements in postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.