Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39261881›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Enhancing total knee arthroplasty outcomes: the role of individualized femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted surgery - A randomized controlled trial.

Dehua Wang, Yu Ye, Xi Liang, Ke Li, Wei Huang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Beyond the coronal plane in robotic total knee arthroplasty-Part 2: Combined flexion does not affect outcomes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dehua Wang *Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1 Youyi Road, Yuanjiagang Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Yu Ye *Department of Orthopaedics, The Second People's Hospital of Yubei District, Chongqing, China.
Xi LiangDepartment of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1 Youyi Road, Yuanjiagang Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Ke Li *Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1 Youyi Road, Yuanjiagang Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China. li.ke-ortho@hotmail.com.
Wei Huang *Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1 Youyi Road, Yuanjiagang Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China. huangwei68@263.net.

Funding

Chongqing Medical University Academic Peak Project cyyy-xkdfjh-lcyj-202304Chongqing Science and Health Joint Medical Research Program 2022DBXM002Technical Innovation and Application Development in Chongqing CSTB202ITIAD-KPX0069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal sagittal alignment of the femoral prosthesis is critical to the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While robotic-assisted TKA can improve alignment accuracy, the efficacy of default femoral alignment versus individualized alignment remains under scrutiny. This study aimed to compare the differences in prosthetic alignment, anatomical restoration, and clinical outcomes between individualized femoral sagittal alignment and default sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted TKA.

methodsIn a prospective randomised controlled trial, 113 patients (120 knees) underwent robotic-assisted TKA were divided into two groups: 61 with individualized femoral flexion (individualized alignment group) and 59 with default 3-5° flexion (default alignment group). The individualized alignment was based on the distal femoral sagittal anteverted angle (DFSAA), defined as the angle between the mechanical and distal anatomical axes of the femur. The radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared.

resultsDespite similar postoperative femoral flexion angles between groups (P = 0.748), the individualized alignment group exhibited significantly lower incidences of femoral prosthesis extension and higher rates of optimal 0-3° prosthesis flexion (9.8% vs. 27.1%, P = 0.014,78.7% vs. 55.9%, p = 0.008, respectively). The individualized alignment group also demonstrated more favourable changes in sagittal anatomy, with higher maintenance of postoperative anterior femoral offset within 1 mm (54.1% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.026) and posterior condylar offset within 1 mm and 2 mm (44.3% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.031,73.8% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.010, respectively). Although slight improvement in the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) at three months was observed (P = 0.045), it did not reach a minimal clinically important difference.

conclusionIndividualized tailoring of femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) enhances prosthetic alignment and anatomical restoration, suggesting potential improvements in postoperative outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemurRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeAnatomyFemoral alignmentOffsetRobotTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39261881
PMCPMC11389516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.