SynthesisBMC oral health2024
Association between removable prosthesis-wearing and pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quantification of Removable Prosthesis Plaque Area Coverage Among Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Pooled it
- From Oral Candidiasis to Candidemia: A Review of Superficial to Invasive Progression.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Validity of the Turkish version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 and its relationship with frailty, malnutrition, and sarcopenia in older adults.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Effect of polishing methods on Candida albicans adhesion and contributing factors in heat-cured acrylic dentures: an in-vitro comparative study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA high burden of respiratory pathogens colonizing removable prosthesis surfaces suggests the potential of association between removable prosthesis-wearing and respiratory infections. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the evidence from clinical studies concerning the association between removable prosthesis-wearing and respiratory infections.
methodsClinical studies that reported respiratory infections associated with adult patients wearing removable prostheses in any centers (hospitals and nursing homes) or communities were included. Literature was searched across five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus) to 28 May 2024. An additional search was performed for unpublished trials and references cited in related studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed for the quality assessment. The certainty assessment was established using GRADE. The results were pooled using a frequentist random-effects meta-analysis and the odds ratios generated.
resultsA total of 1143 articles were identified. Thirteen articles had full-text articles screening and an additional two articles were added through reference linkage. Ultimately, six non-randomized clinical studies reporting various types of pneumonia contributed to this review. Overall odds of having pneumonia among prosthesis wearers were 1.43 (95% CI: 0.76 to 2.69) and 1.27 (95% CI: 1.11 to 1.46) using the random- and fixed-effects models, respectively. The heterogeneity in the meta-analysis was substantial. In subgroup analysis according to the study design, the heterogeneity within prospective studies was much reduced, I
conclusionsThere was no conclusive evidence from the non-randomized clinical studies supporting whether prosthesis-wearing is a risk factor for pneumonia based on outcomes from this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.