Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39261674›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Ex vivo electrical bioimpedance measurements and Cole modelling on the porcine colon and rectum.

S A Jaimes-Morales, V E Aguirre-Cardona, C A Gonzalez-Correa

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S A Jaimes-MoralesResearch Group on Electrical Bio-Impedance (GruBIE), Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia. samuel.jaimes34053@ucaldas.edu.co.
V E Aguirre-CardonaResearch Group on Electrical Bio-Impedance (GruBIE), Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia. victoria.22919131580@ucaldas.edu.co.
C A Gonzalez-CorreaResearch Group on Electrical Bio-Impedance (GruBIE), Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia. c.gonzalez@ucaldas.edu.co.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different pathological changes in the large intestine wall, associated with the development of different chronic diseases, including colorectal cancer, could be reflected in electrical bioimpedance readings. Thickness and composition of the mucus bilayer covering it in the luminal side, abundance of bacteria of the intestinal microbiota, the permeability of the epithelium and inflammation are some of these. However, scientific literature on electrical passive properties of the large intestine is scarce. In this study, complex impedance measurements at 8 frequencies were carried out on 6 specimens of porcine colorectal tissue, within half ab hour post-mortem, obtained from a local abattoir. For 5 different distances, measured proximally from the border of the anus, 3 readings were taken at 3 different points with a tetrapolar probe. The results show 2 different dielectric dispersions in the α and β regions and it seems that there is a relationship between the values of resistivities and the thickness of the wall. Also, parameter values both for the Cole and the geometrical models are given. Another set of electrical bioimpedance readings was carried out in order to assess the effect of the mucus layer on electrical properties of the tissue. It seems that these layers are related to the low frequency dispersion. Finally, electrical passive properties of porcine colorectal tissue, reported in this work, give reference values and behaviour patterns that could be applied for further research in human medicine, based on bioimpedance measurements.

Indexed as

ColonElectric ImpedanceRectumAnimalsSwine

Identifiers

PMID39261674
PMCPMC11391046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.