ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Prognostic factors associated with acute retinal necrosis treated non-surgically.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Retinal toxicity induced by intravitreal ganciclovir injection: case series and systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical performance of the multiplex solid-phase "Direct Strip PCR" for infectious uveitis: a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo analyse the prognostic factors for visual acuity in acute retinal necrosis (ARN) patients treated non-surgically.
methodsThe clinical data of ARN patients who visited our hospital from January 2010 to January 2023 were retrospectively analysed.
resultsTwenty-four patients (29 eyes) were included. Aqueous humour samples were collected from 20 out of 29 eyes, and PCR confirmed that 85% (17/20) of the eyes had VZV infection, 10% (2/20) had CMV infection, and 5% (1/20) had HSV infection. All patients were treated with intravenous antiviral agents. Intravitreal ganciclovir and oral corticosteroids were given according to the patients' wishes. A comparison of visual acuity at the time of first identification of inactive ARN with that at the first visit revealed that 16 (55.2%) eyes improved and 13 (44.8%) did not improve. Logistic regression analysis revealed that risk factors for failure to improve vision after treatment included retinal detachment (odds ratio [OR],33.75; 95% CI, 3.245-351.067; P = 0.003), necrotising retinitis involving the posterior pole (odds ratio [OR],8.167; 95% CI, 1.297-51.403, P = 0.025), and arteritis involving the large retinal arteries (odds ratio [OR],9.167; 95% CI, 1.493-56.297; P = 0.017). The VZV viral load in the aqueous humour at initial presentation was significantly associated with visual prognosis (r = 0.688, P = 0.013), retinal detachment (τ = 0.597, P = 0.021) and the extent of retinal necrosis (τ = 0.57, P = 0.027). The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of VZV-infected patients at first presentation was significantly correlated with the prognosis of visual acuity (r = 0.616, P = 0.033) and retinal detachment (τ = 0.728, P = 0.004).
conclusionsHigh NLR and viral DNA copy number in the aqueous humour at the initial presentation, as well as subsequent retinal detachment, necrotising retinitis involving the posterior pole, and arteritis involving the large retinal arteries were risk factors for poor visual prognosis in VZV-infected ARN patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.