ArticleScientific reports2024
Effectiveness evaluation of different steel fibers on the shear strength of reinforced SFRC slender beams without web rebars.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current studies have mainly focused on the effect of specific steel fibers on the shear performance of steel fiber-reinforced concrete (SFRC) slender beams. However, there has been a lack of in-depth research evaluating the effectiveness of different steel fibers through a statistically comparative analysis of experimental data from various researchers. Existing design methods do not fully account for the impact of all types of steel fibers on the shear capacity of SFRC slender beams, providing very limited guidance on selecting appropriate steel fibers. This highlights the need for research to verify the strengthening effectiveness of different steel fibers. This paper establishes databases comprising 232 shear-failed reinforced SFRC beams with four other types of steel fibers straight wire, deformed wire, deformed cut-sheet and ingot mill, based on a comprehensive review of published literature. These databases complement an existing database of 280 reinforced SFRC beams using hook-end wire steel fibers as shear reinforcement. The databases are used to evaluate the validity of several well-known existing formulas for predicting the shear capacity of beams and to determine the fiber bond factor values that reflect the diverse strengthening effects of different steel fibers. Utilizing a simi-empirical synergetic prediction model for the shear strength of reinforced SFRC slender beams with hook-end wire steel fibers, the shear resistances of test beams in databases with the other four types of steel fiber are analyzed. The primary contributors to shear capacity are identified as the uncracked shear-compression SFRC and the dowel action of longitudinal tensile steel bars. The contribution of steel fibers is linked to the shear resistance of uncracked shear-compression SFRC. From a practical design perspective, a conservative prediction formula is verified, aligning with the lower boundary of the tested shear strength obtained from the database of beams. Finally, suitable steel fibers for s enhancing the shear strength of reinforced SFRC beams without web rebars are suggested based on their effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.