ArticleScientific reports2024
Effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave with different frequencies on acute skeletal muscle injury in rabbits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with conventional physical therapy for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Narrative review: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pain management in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: Mechanisms, clinical applications, and safety.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Ultrastructural insights into early myoblast differentiation induced by shockwave stimulation.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To study the efficacy and possible mechanisms of radial extracorporeal shock wave (rESW) with different frequencies for the treatment of acute skeletal muscle injury in rabbits, 48 rabbits of acute injured biceps femoris were randomly divided into 4 groups. Except for the control group, the other groups were treated by rESW with 5 Hz, 10 Hz and 15 Hz, respectively. The injury symptom index scores (ISISs) in the rESW group were significantly lower than those in the control group, with the lowest in the 10 Hz rESW group. Histomorphological features demonstrated a decrease in mononuclear cells and an increase in new myocytes across all groups, with the rESW group showing the most significant changes. The concentrations of PGE2 and IL-1β were significantly lower in all rESW groups by ELISA compared to the control group. Additionally, the 10 Hz group had lower concentrations than the 5 Hz and 15 Hz group. Compared with the control group, MyoD of the rESW groups was significantly increased, and the expression level of the 10 Hz group was higher than that of the other groups. In conclusion, rESW with 5 Hz, 10 Hz and 15 Hz take certain curative effects on acute biceps femoris injury in rabbits, and the 10 Hz rESW takes advantage over 5 Hz and 15 Hz rESW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.