ArticleScientific reports2024
Association between composite dietary antioxidant index and erectile dysfunction among American adults: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is closely related to oxidative stress, and antioxidant is a treatment and prevention method for erectile dysfunction. The Compound Dietary Antioxidant Index (CDAI) represents the overall dietary antioxidant intake of the human body. However, the link between CDAI and ED is unclear. The objective of this research was to examine the linkage between CDAI and ED. The research utilized information collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) spanning the years 2001 to 2004. To assess the association between CDAI and ED, the analysis employed weighted multivariate logistic regression along with weighted restricted cubic splines (RCS). Additionally, subgroup interaction analysis was conducted to confirm the findings. In this investigation, 3184 adults from the U.S., all above the age of 20, were part of the study cohort, with 863 of them identified as having ED. Adjustments for potential confounding variables revealed that the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of CDAI associating with ED was 0.95 (0.92-0.99; P = 0.01). Besides, compared to the lowest tertile, the highest tertile of CDAI was associated with a lower risk of ED (0.63 [0.46-0.88]; P = 0.01). The application of weighted restricted cubic splines (RCS) analysis delineated a nonlinear inverse relationship between CDAI levels and the probability of ED. Subgroup analysis further demonstrated that the association between CDAI and ED remained consistent across subgroups. This cross-sectional analysis revealed a significant correlation, indicating that elevated levels of CDAI are closely linked with a lower likelihood of ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.