Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39261536›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Auditory objects in working memory include task-irrelevant features.

Cora Fischer, Carina Nolting, Flavia Schneider, Christoph Bledowski, Jochen Kaiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cora FischerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Str. 10, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Carina NoltingInstitute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Str. 10, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Flavia SchneiderInstitute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Str. 10, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christoph BledowskiInstitute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Str. 10, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3628-7683
Jochen KaiserInstitute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Str. 10, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. j.kaiser@med.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6740-5000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Object-based attention operates both in perception and visual working memory. While the efficient perception of auditory stimuli also requires the formation of auditory objects, little is known about their role in auditory working memory (AWM). To investigate whether attention to one object feature in AWM leads to the involuntary maintenance of another, task-irrelevant feature, we conducted four experiments. Stimuli were abstract sounds that differed on the dimensions frequency and location, only one of which was task-relevant in each experiment. The first two experiments required a match-nonmatch decision about a probe sound whose irrelevant feature value could either be identical to or differ from the memorized stimulus. Matches on the relevant dimension were detected more accurately when the irrelevant feature matched as well, whereas for nonmatches on the relevant dimension, performance was better for irrelevant feature nonmatches. Signal-detection analysis showed that changes of irrelevant frequency reduced the sensitivity for sound location. Two further experiments used continuous report tasks. When location was the target feature, changes of irrelevant sound frequency had an impact on both recall error and adjustment time. Irrelevant location changes affected adjustment time only. In summary, object-based attention led to a concurrent maintenance of task-irrelevant sound features in AWM.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAttentionAuditory PerceptionMemory, Short-TermAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAuditory working memoryFrequencyIrrelevant change effectIrrelevant featureLocationObject-based attention

Identifiers

PMID39261536
PMCPMC11390711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.