ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder: Navigating Depression Treatment in Traditional and Digital Settings with Insights from Current Research.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Lifestyle Change in Overweight Pregnant Women: A Feasibility Pilot Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital Therapeutics and Blended Care in Major Depressive Disorder: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the shortcomings of a mechanistic assumption of traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a newer generation of CBT-grounded interventions focusing on process-orientated emotional and motivational aspects has emerged. These so-called third-wave CBTs emphasize function and context of inner experience over form and content, and have become evidence-based practice in the past four decades. Among these approaches, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has both a large body of research for various (mental) health conditions, including major depressive disorder (MDD) in particular. ACT is a transdiagnostic approach that intends to increase psychological flexibility (PF) of clients as a universal mechanism of behavior change and a value-driven orientation in life. By focusing on present-moment awareness, acceptance, defusion, establishing a stable sense of self, clarifying personal valued life directions, and committing to behaviors consistent to these values, ACT targets the core processes of PF. Meta-analyses have indicated the efficacy and effectiveness of ACT in reducing depressive symptoms and increasing well-being, with mainly moderate effect sizes in clinical trials. ACT for MDD has been shown to be effective across different delivery modes (e.g., individual, group, digital). ACT can also be applied using self-help formats (e.g., mobile apps) and combined with features from compatible approaches like behavioral activation. There is also evidence for a high acceptability of ACT and adherence rates comparable to classic CBT. Moreover, process research has shown that ACT works specifically through the mediator of PF and by addressing its suggested core therapeutic processes. Given the essential role of offering a personalized therapeutic strategy in treatment outcomes and adherence, it is central to provide more effective options that match clients' needs and preferences. This chapter illustrates different applications of ACT for adults with MDD and the current evidence base to promote informed decisions on using ACT as additional or stand-alone therapeutic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39261432What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.