Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39261403›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2024

The effect of cold plasma on the treatment of external otitis: an experimental study in rats.

Tayebe Taghizade, Alireza Akbarzadeh-Baghban, Nasrin Navab Safa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tayebe TaghizadeDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza Akbarzadeh-BaghbanProteomics Research Center, Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nasrin Navab SafaDepartment of Physics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. navabsafa_n@iau.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1512-6899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the influence of cold plasma as novel method on the external otitis treatment which is a frequent cause of earache. 24 infected external auditory canals in 24 rats were categorized in four experimental groups including control, plasma exposed, ciprofloxacin drug and mixed of plasma-ciprofloxacin groups. In plasma group, dielectric barrier discharge was employed as the source of cold plasma in 5 days. All rats were observed with otoscope daily and a scoring system was used to evaluate swelling and effusion of the ear canal. Number of colonies in microbiological culture were counted in each group during the first 5 days after treatment. For the multiple group comparisons of swelling and effusion measured in the external auditory canal, Kruskal-Wallis analysis was applied and one-way anova and Kruskal-Wallis analysis was used for the statistical analysis of the results of the cultures in different days. Also, Tukey and Mann-Whitney tests was applied for multiple comparisons. Our findings show that swelling and effusion were obviously reduced in plasma group compared to control group (P < 0.01). Number of colonies in control group was statistically different from those in drug, plasma, and mixed group on the second to fifth day (p < 0.001). According to the results cold plasma can be introduced as an impressive method for external otitis treatment. Moreover, when cold plasma joined to antibiotic method, it leads to a superior performance respecting plasma or antibiotic method alone.

Indexed as

Cold plasmaEffusionExternal otitisRat

Identifiers

PMID39261403
PMCPMC11390991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.