ReviewHematology, transfusion and cell therapy
When innovation meets patient blood management - a new way to see bleeding.
Review in Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Passive, Active, or Both-What Hemostats Do Surgeons Choose in the Real World, and Should We Rethink It?Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Patient Blood Management in Brazil: between evidence, reality and transformation.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first step in innovation is to identify a problem of real relevance and systematically address it to deliver a sophisticated and viable solution. Disruptive innovation is a process where technology, products, or services are transformed or replaced by a better innovative solution. This superiority must be perceived by users as being more accessible, simple, or convenient. Patient Blood Management (PBM) suggests the notion of the timely application of evidence-based medical and surgical concepts designed to maintain hemoglobin concentration, optimize hemostasis and minimize blood loss thus improving patient outcomes, that is, they are aimed at changing patient care, assisting healthcare professionals in disease treatment and cure as well as risk reduction. Thus, innovation in PBM is a new frontier to be pursued. The management of patient's blood and preparation for surgical procedures is an enormous challenge that helps minimize anemia and control blood loss during hospitalization, ensuring they are discharged in adequate clinical conditions. Until 2016, there was no standard definition or classification for the severity of intraoperative bleeding or hemostasis. The development of a PBM program when combined to the development of a bleeding scale such as the validated Intraoperative Bleeding (VIBe) Scale, represents a new solution that balances perioperative blood loss and more importantly, enables a critical cultural change which can be useful to help surgeons communicate anticipated hemostatic needs throughout a case and therefore enhance efficiency leading to better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.