ArticleHematology, transfusion and cell therapy2024
Assessment of erythrocyte alloimmunization among patients treated at a Brazilian university hospital.
Article in Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Prevalence and Specificity of Red Blood Cell Antibodies in Blood Donors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlloimmunization and transfusion reactions underscore the crucial role of precise immunohematological techniques to enhance safety in transfusion. This study aims to determine the frequency of alloimmunization in patients treated at a Brazilian university hospital, investigate demographic, clinical, and epidemiological characteristics of patients with positive irregular antibody screening, as well as to assess the frequency of erythrocyte antigens and anti-erythrocyte antibodies in the population. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective observational study included all irregular antibody-positive patients treated at the transfusion service of Hospital de Clínicas of the Federal University of Uberlandia between January 2019 and December 2020.
resultsOf the 201 irregular antibody-positive patients, alloimmunization was more common in women (64.2%) than in men (35.8%). Blood groups A (39.8%) and O (38.8%), and Rh positive samples (69.1%) predominated, and about half (48.2%) of the patients were transfused for preoperative procedures. The most frequently found clinically significant alloantibodies were anti-D (27.2%), anti-E (15.0%), and anti-Kell (11.5%). Of the patients, 30.6% had multiple antibody associations, with anti-D and anti-C being the most common combination. Erythrocyte immunophenotyping was performed for 76 patients with the most frequent antigens detected being e (100%), c (86.8%), and C (40.8%). Among the 14 pregnant women evaluated, most were multiparous, 85.7% had anti-D as the most prevalent antibody, and had the A-negative blood type (33.3%).
conclusionAlloantibody screening and identification associated with erythrocyte immunophenotyping are necessary for a better understanding of the alloimmunized population, ensuring greater safety and efficacy of transfusion therapy in the hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.