ArticleMicrobes and environments2024
Does Rhizobial Inoculation Change the Microbial Community in Field Soils? A Comparison with Agricultural Land-use Changes.
Article in Microbes and environments, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Higher-dimensional ordination analysis teases out impacts ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium ottawaense Effectively Reduces NMicrobes and environments · 2026Article
- Screening of Bradyrhizobium ottawaense with High NMicrobes and environments · 2026Article
- Genetic design of soybean hosts and bradyrhizobial endosymbionts reduces NNature communications · 2025Article
- Single-cell genomics of single soil aggregates: methodological assessment and potential implications with a focus on nitrogen metabolism.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Assessing the effects of NapA gene overexpression on denitrification and denitrogenation in magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense MSR-1.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although microbial inoculation may be effective for sustainable crop production, detrimental aspects have been argued because of the potential of inoculated microorganisms to behave as invaders and negatively affect the microbial ecosystem. We herein compared the impact of rhizobial inoculation on the soil bacterial community with that of agricultural land-use changes using a 16S rRNA amplicon ana-lysis. Soybean plants were cultivated with and without five types of bradyrhizobial inoculants (Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens or Bradyrhizobium ottawaense) in experimental fields of Andosol, and the high nodule occupancy (35-72%) of bradyrhizobial inoculants was confirmed by nosZ PCR. However, bradyrhizobial inoculants did not significantly affect Shannon's diversity index (α-diversity) or shifts (β-diversity) in the bacterial community in the soils. Moreover, the soil bacterial community was significantly affected by land-use types (conventional cropping, organic cropping, and original forest), where β-diversity correlated with soil chemical properties (pH, carbon, and nitrogen contents). Therefore, the effects of bradyrhizobial inoculation on bacterial communities in bulk soil were minor, regardless of high nodule occupancy. We also observed a correlation between the relative abundance of bacterial classes (Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Gemmatimonadetes) and land-use types or soil chemical properties. The impact of microbial inoculation on soil microbial ecosystems has been exami-ned to a limited extent, such as rhizosphere communities and viability. In the present study, we found that bacterial community shifts in soil were more strongly affected by land usage than by rhizobial inoculation. Therefore, the results obtained herein highlight the importance of assessing microbial inoculants in consideration of the entire land management system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.