Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39260892›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

The Neural and Computational Architecture of Feedback Dynamics in Mouse Cortex during Stimulus Report.

Simone Ciceri, Matthijs N Oude Lohuis, Vivi Rottschäfer, Cyriel M A Pennartz, Daniele Avitabile, Simon van Gaal, Umberto Olcese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone CiceriInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584CC, Netherlands.
Matthijs N Oude LohuisCognitive and Systems Neuroscience, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098XH, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9781-848X
Vivi RottschäferMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden 2333CA, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4150-3486
Cyriel M A PennartzCognitive and Systems Neuroscience, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098XH, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8328-1175
Daniele AvitabileAmsterdam Center for Dynamics and Computation, Mathematics Department, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081HV, Netherlands d.avitabile@vu.nl s.vangaal@uva.nl u.olcese@uva.nl.
Simon van GaalResearch Priority Area Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098XH, Netherlands d.avitabile@vu.nl s.vangaal@uva.nl u.olcese@uva.nl.
Umberto OlceseCognitive and Systems Neuroscience, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098XH, Netherlands d.avitabile@vu.nl s.vangaal@uva.nl u.olcese@uva.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conscious reportability of visual input is associated with a bimodal neural response in the primary visual cortex (V1): an early-latency response coupled to stimulus features and a late-latency response coupled to stimulus report or detection. This late wave of activity, central to major theories of consciousness, is thought to be driven by the prefrontal cortex (PFC), responsible for "igniting" it. Here we analyzed two electrophysiological studies in mice performing different stimulus detection tasks and characterized neural activity profiles in three key cortical regions: V1, posterior parietal cortex (PPC), and PFC. We then developed a minimal network model, constrained by known connectivity between these regions, reproducing the spatiotemporal propagation of visual- and report-related activity. Remarkably, while PFC was indeed necessary to generate report-related activity in V1, this occurred only through the mediation of PPC. PPC, and not PFC, had the final veto in enabling the report-related late wave of V1 activity.

Indexed as

Prefrontal CortexAnimalsFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, NeurologicalNeuronsParietal LobePhotic StimulationPrimary Visual CortexVisual CortexVisual Perceptioncomputational neuroscienceconsciousnessperceptionreport-related activity

Identifiers

PMID39260892
PMCPMC11444237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.