ArticleBMJ open2024
Stated preferences of adolescents and young adults for sexual and reproductive health services in Africa: a systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stated preferences of adolescents and young adults for sexual and reproductive health services in Africa: a systematic review.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescence and young adulthood are critical life stages with varied healthcare needs. Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are often confronted with challenges in their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and rights. Uptake of SRH services among AYAs groups remains limited, especially in resource-limited settings. This could be partly attributed to the existing services not catering for the preferences of AYAs. However, there is no systematic evaluation of research to explore the preferences of AYAs for SRH services in Africa. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to assess AYAs's preferences for SRH in Africa. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic review will follow the recommendations of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. Stated preference studies in the area of SRH services conducted among AYAs will be included. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Global Health and Google Scholar databases. Two independent researchers will screen the articles, and any disagreement will be handled through discussion with the broader research team. The quality of the included papers will be assessed and reported. The preferences for attributes, the most important and least important attributes and preference heterogeneity will be reported. In addition, the preference research gap across African regions and SRH services among AYAs will be reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this protocol. The systematic review findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023386944.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.