Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39260855›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Barriers and facilitators to implementing imaging-based diagnostic artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making software in hospitals in China: a qualitative study using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Xiwen Liao, Chen Yao, Feifei Jin, Jun Zhang, Larry Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Atencion primaria · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stakeholder Perspectives of Implementation Barriers of Artificial Intelligence in Eye Care: A qualitative framework-based study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiwen LiaoPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2349-8775
Chen YaoPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China yaochen.pucri@foxmail.com.
Feifei JinTrauma Medicine Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4991-0158
Jun ZhangMSD R&D (China) Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Larry LiuMerck & Co Inc, Rahway, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify the barriers and facilitators to the successful implementation of imaging-based diagnostic artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted decision-making software in China, using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a theoretical basis to develop strategies that promote effective implementation.

designThis qualitative study involved semistructured interviews with key stakeholders from both clinical settings and industry. Interview guide development, coding, analysis and reporting of findings were thoroughly informed by the updated CFIR.

settingFour healthcare institutions in Beijing and Shanghai and two vendors of AI-assisted decision-making software for lung nodules detection and diabetic retinopathy screening were selected based on purposive sampling.

participantsA total of 23 healthcare practitioners, 6 hospital informatics specialists, 4 hospital administrators and 7 vendors of the selected AI-assisted decision-making software were included in the study.

resultsWithin the 5 CFIR domains, 10 constructs were identified as barriers, 8 as facilitators and 3 as both barriers and facilitators. Major barriers included unsatisfactory clinical performance (Innovation); lack of collaborative network between primary and tertiary hospitals, lack of information security measures and certification (outer setting); suboptimal data quality, misalignment between software functions and goals of healthcare institutions (inner setting); unmet clinical needs (individuals). Key facilitators were strong empirical evidence of effectiveness, improved clinical efficiency (innovation); national guidelines related to AI, deployment of AI software in peer hospitals (outer setting); integration of AI software into existing hospital systems (inner setting) and involvement of clinicians (implementation process).

conclusionsThe study findings contributed to the ongoing exploration of AI integration in healthcare from the perspective of China, emphasising the need for a comprehensive approach considering both innovation-specific factors and the broader organisational and contextual dynamics. As China and other developing countries continue to advance in adopting AI technologies, the derived insights could further inform healthcare practitioners, industry stakeholders and policy-makers, guiding policies and practices that promote the successful implementation of imaging-based diagnostic AI-assisted decision-making software in healthcare for optimal patient care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceQualitative ResearchChinaDiabetic RetinopathyHospitalsHumansInterviews as TopicSoftwareChinaClinical Decision-MakingImplementation ScienceInformation technology

Identifiers

PMID39260855
PMCPMC11409362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.