Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39260850›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Incidence, symptom clusters and determinants of post-acute COVID symptoms: a population-based surveillance in community-dwelling users of the COVID RADAR app.

Willian J van Dijk, Miriam L Haaksma, Dennis O Mook-Kanamori, Leo G Visser, Mattijs E Numans, A van Hylckama Vlieg, Frits R Rosendaal, Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Willian J van DijkDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands w.j.van_dijk@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6314-9326
Miriam L HaaksmaDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dennis O Mook-KanamoriDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leo G VisserDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mattijs E NumansDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
A van Hylckama VliegDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frits R RosendaalDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jessica C Kiefte-de JongDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8136-0918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to describe the incidence, symptom clusters and determinants of post-acute COVID symptoms using data from the COVID RADAR app in the Netherlands.

designProspective cohort.

settingGeneral population in the Netherlands from April 2020 to February 2022.

participantsA total of 1478 COVID RADAR app users, with data spanning 40 days before to 100 days after positive SARS-CoV-2 test. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and duration of 10 new symptoms that developed during acute infection, defined as 10 days prior and 10 days after positive test. Clustering of these post-acute COVID symptoms and associations between factors known in the acute phase and 100-day symptom persistence.

resultsThe most frequent post-acute symptoms were cough, loss of smell or taste and fatigue. At 100 days postinfection, 86 (8%) participants still experienced symptoms. Three post-acute COVID symptom clusters were identified: non-respiratory (headache and fatigue; 49% of participants with post-acute COVID symptoms); olfactory (15%) and respiratory (8%). Vaccination was associated with a lower risk of post-acute COVID symptoms 100 days after infection, although CIs were wide (OR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.2 to 1.5), but not with non-respiratory symptoms (OR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.3 to 4.4). Severe acute disease increased the risk of post-acute COVID symptoms (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2 to 1.5; per additional acute symptom).

conclusionsIn this cohort of infected community-dwelling app users, 5%-10% experienced post-acute COVID symptoms. The symptoms cluster in several distinct entities, which differ in incidence, patient characteristics and vaccination effects. This suggests multiple mechanisms underlying the development of post-acute COVID symptoms.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mobile ApplicationsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2AdultAgedCoughFatigueFemaleHumansIncidenceIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective Studiescommunity participationCOVID-19post-acute COVID-19 syndromevaccination

Identifiers

PMID39260850
PMCPMC11409358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.