Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39260838›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Development of a core outcome set of clinical research on the integration of traditional Chinese and Western medicine for spinal metastases:

Guozheng Fang, Wenlong Yu, Dingbang Chen, Xing Ding, Liang Qiao, Luosheng Zhang, Xin Gao, Yinjie Yan, Quan Huang, Junming Ma and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Guozheng FangShanghai Baoshan Luodian Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Wenlong YuDepartment of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicinev, Shanghai, China.
Dingbang ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xing DingDepartment of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicinev, Shanghai, China.
Liang QiaoDepartment of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicinev, Shanghai, China.
Luosheng ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xin GaoDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yinjie YanDepartment of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicinev, Shanghai, China.
Quan HuangDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Junming MaDepartment of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicinev, Shanghai, China yinmengchen0513@126.com junming_spine@163.com.
Mengchen YinDepartment of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicinev, Shanghai, China yinmengchen0513@126.com junming_spine@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7404-1495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the incidence of spinal metastasis (SM) has been increasing steadily. In response to this serious public health problem, researchers have made progress by using the integration of traditional Chinese and Western medicine. However, considerable heterogeneity in the definition and measurement of outcomes across clinical research studies, along with the lack of uniform measurement standards for study data, makes it difficult for researchers to compare different treatments. Therefore, it is crucial to accurately evaluate clinical research on the integration of traditional Chinese and Western medicine for SM.

methodsThis study protocol outlines a comprehensive research programme based on the Core Outcome Set Standards Protocol Items. The study consists of four phases: a literature review, semistructured interviews, a two-round modified Delphi survey, a consensus meeting. Phase 1 involves a comprehensive literature review to extract outcomes used in current clinical studies of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine or Western medicine for the treatment of SM. A semistructured interview format will be used to survey patients and caregivers in phase 2 to collect suggestions from the patient perspective. Phase 3 involves a two-round modified Delphi survey to complete a prioritisation evaluation of outcomes to generate a candidate list for core outcome set (COS). Finally, phase 4 involves a face-to-face consensus meeting to review and establish the COS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Conducted in response to the current dilemma of SM, the study was endorsed by the Spine Oncology Group of the Orthopaedic Surgeons Branch of the Chinese Physicians' Association. It will be developed and reported through a rigorous process, with the results of the study to be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueMedicine, Chinese TraditionalResearch DesignSpinal NeoplasmsBiomedical ResearchConsensusHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareNeurosurgeryOrthopaedic oncologyOrthopaedic & trauma surgeryQuality of LifeSpine

Identifiers

PMID39260838
PMCPMC11409365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.