ArticleBMJ global health2024
Supporting caregivers of children living with disability in a humanitarian context: realist-informed evaluation of the '
Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Child public health interventions for conflict-affected populations: A systematic review.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo ensure that humanitarian action is disability-inclusive, evidence is needed to understand how different strategies to support children living with disabilities and their families can work in these settings. Evidence from other contexts suggests support groups can improve caregiver quality of life (QOL). This study reports an evaluation of the '
methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods realist-informed before-and-after study to measure change in caregiver-reported QOL and explore how and for whom the programme worked, and in what contexts. Female caregivers of children with any disability were recruited through clinics in urban Kabul (n=3) and rural Paghman district (n=3). We collected quantitative data on QOL pre/post programme using the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory Family Impact Module (PedsQL-FIM). Qualitative data were collected through facilitator and participant focus groups postprogramme.
results118 caregivers participated in two cohorts (November 2020, February 2021). Caregivers expressed a significant increase in QOL from baseline to programme completion (t(125)=-10.7, p≤0.0001). Participation in cohort 2 was associated with the greatest PedsQL-FIM change.Qualitative data revealed positive changes postprogramme in five key areas: caregiver mindset, parenting practices, disability-inclusive behaviours, psychological well-being and child functioning. These changes were seen as both outcomes and mechanisms influencing the primary outcome of QOL. Mechanisms that mediated these changes included increased knowledge of disability and the core acceptance and commitment therapy components of mindfulness and acceptance.
conclusionThe
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.