Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39260824›Full record

ArticleActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2025

A national evaluation of a multi-modal, blended, digital intervention integrated within Australian youth mental health services.

M Alvarez-Jimenez, J Nicholas, L Valentine, P Liu, S Mangelsdorf, S Baker, T Gilbertson, G O'Loughlin, C McEnery, P D McGorry and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. National Implementation of Perinatal Mental Health Treatment-The MumSpace Digital Stepped-Care Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

M Alvarez-JimenezOrygen Digital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3535-9086
J NicholasOrygen Digital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1889-1107
L ValentineOrygen Digital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7481-6537
P LiuOrygen Digital, Parkville, Australia.
S MangelsdorfOrygen Digital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5056-1023
S BakerOrygen Digital, Parkville, Australia.
T GilbertsonOrygen Digital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-8002
G O'LoughlinOrygen Digital, Parkville, Australia.
C McEneryOrygen Digital, Parkville, Australia.
P D McGorryOrygen Digital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-6168
J F GleesonHealthy Brain and Mind Research Centre, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, School of Psychology, The Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7969-492X
S P CrossOrygen Digital, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5413-8342

Funding

ACT GovernmentChildren's Hospital FoundationNational Health and Medical Research Council 2009782National Health and Medical Research Council APP1177235New South Wales GovernmentQueensland GovernmentState Government of VictoriaTelstra Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYouth mental health (YMH) services have been established internationally to provide timely, age-appropriate, mental health treatment and improve long-term outcomes. However, YMH services face challenges including long waiting times, limited continuity of care, and time-bound support. To bridge this gap, MOST was developed as a scalable, blended, multi-modal digital platform integrating real-time and asynchronous clinician-delivered counselling; interactive psychotherapeutic content; vocational support; peer support, and a youth-focused online community. The implementation of MOST within Australian YMH services has been publicly funded.

objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world engagement, outcomes, and experience of MOST during the first 32 months of implementation.

methodYoung people from participating YMH services were referred into MOST. Engagement metrics were derived from platform usage. Symptom and satisfaction measures were collected at baseline, 6, and 12 (primary endpoint) weeks. Effect sizes were calculated for the primary outcomes of depression and anxiety and secondary outcomes of psychological distress and wellbeing.

resultsFive thousand seven hundred and two young people from 262 clinics signed up and used MOST at least once. Young people had an average of 19 login sessions totalling 129 min over the first 12 weeks of use, with 71.7% using MOST for at least 14 days, 40.1% for 12 weeks, and 18.8% for 24 weeks. There was a statistically significant, moderate improvement in depression and anxiety at 12 weeks as measured by the PHQ4 across all users irrespective of treatment stage (d = 0.41, 95% CI 0.35-0.46). Satisfaction levels were high, with 93% recommending MOST to a friend. One thousand one hundred and eighteen young people provided written feedback, of which 68% was positive and 31% suggested improvement.

conclusionsMOST is a highly promising blended digital intervention with potential to address the limitations and enhance the impact of YMH services.

Indexed as

blended interventionsdigital mental healthimplementationinternet treatmentyouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID39260824
PMCPMC11787918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.