Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39260095›Full record

ArticleClinical genitourinary cancer2024

Quantification of Gleason Pattern 4 Metrics Identifies Pathologic Progression in Patients With Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.

Marlon Perera, Melissa Assel, Sunny Nalavenkata, Sari Khaleel, Nicole Benfante, Sigrid V Carlsson, Victor E Reuter, Vincent P Laudone, Peter T Scardino, Karim A Touijer and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Marlon PereraDepartment of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Melissa AsselDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Sunny NalavenkataDepartment of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Sari KhaleelDepartment of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Nicole BenfanteDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Sigrid V CarlssonDepartment of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Victor E ReuterDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Vincent P LaudoneDepartment of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Peter T ScardinoDepartment of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Karim A TouijerDepartment of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
James A EasthamDepartment of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Andrew J VickersDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Samson W FineDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Behfar EhdaieDepartment of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: ehdaieb@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JAMES A EASTHAM · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
Improving shared decision making in cancer screeningK22CA234400 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CARLSSON, SIGRID · 2019 to 2021
$621k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA234400NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring active surveillance (AS) for Grade Group (GG) 2 prostate cancer, pathologic progression to GG3 on surveillance biopsy is a trigger for intervention. However, this ratio of GP3:GP4, may be obscured by increases of relatively indolent disease. We aimed to explore changes in GP4 quantity during AS and propose alternative definitions for progression based on GP4 changes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe assessed patients enrolled on AS between November 2014 and March 2020 with GG2 disease on diagnostic biopsy and subsequent surveillance biopsy approximately 1 year later. Outcome measures included change in overall %GP4 and total length GP4 (mm). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: 61 patients met the inclusion criteria, the median change in total length of GP4 and %GP4 was -0.12 mm (IQR -0.31, 0.09) and -2.5% (IQR -8.6, 0.0), respectively. Excluding the 35 patients with no evidence of GP4 on surveillance biopsy, median change in total GP4 length and %GP4 was 0.19 mm (IQR -0.04, 0.67) and 1.2% (IQR -1.6, 6.6), respectively. Three patients progressed to GG3 disease on surveillance biopsy, one of whom had only a small increase in %GP4. Conversely, an additional 2 patients who did not meet the criterion for GG3 had a large increase (> 1 mm) in total GP4 length.

conclusionsPresence of GG3 disease on surveillance biopsy as a trigger for treatment in men on AS is of questionable use alone; we suggest including other measures that do not depend on a ratio, such as an increase in total GP4 length.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionNeoplasm GradingProstatic NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstateBiomarkerISUP gradingOutcomesProstate biopsyRisk stratfication

Identifiers

PMID39260095
PMCPMC12895705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.