ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024
Electronic health record system use and documentation burden of acute and critical care nurse clinicians: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the trust-adoption gap for AI scribes in rural communities: A machine learning approach using the 2024 Canadian digital health survey.International journal of medical informatics · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Using Digital Clinical Records to Identify Factors Associated with Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes During Hospitalization: A Pilot Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Prospective Associations of Behavioural and Organisational Factors with Initial Nursing Diagnosis Use: A Longitudinal Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Nurses' Ethical Reasoning About Digital Ethical Risks: A Vignette-Elicited Qualitative Study.International nursing review · 2026Article
- The Impact of Digital Transformation on Nursing Professional Experience: Critical Interpretive Synthesis Review Developing the Fragmented Professional Transition in Nursing (FPT-N) Model.Asian/Pacific Island nursing journal · 2026Review
- Accuracy and Documentation of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Assessments in a Cardiothoracic Critical Care Unit: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Audit.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Moral Distress and the Governance of Attention in Nursing: A Hanian Reading of the Structural Restriction of Moral Agency.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026Article
- Digital burnout in nursing: development of a valid and reliable scale to assess digital burnout associated with the digitalization process in nursing.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Usability of Digital Health Technologies in the US: Results from a Descriptive National Online Survey of Nurses.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2026Article
- The ESCAPE Framework: A Practical Two-Phase Mixed-Methods Approach for Usability Evaluation of Interoperable Health IT.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2026Article
- Understanding Remission of Long-Term Conditions Through Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- A Holistic Nursing Surveillance Decision Support System for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring nurses' documentation prioritization strategies to alleviate EHR documentation burden: a phenomenological study.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Knowledge and attitudes regarding AI-assisted documentation among clinical nurses in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Hospital Digital Transformation, Nursing Data Burden, and Leadership and Governance Capacity: A Critical Narrative Review.Journal of nursing management · 2026Review
- An AI-Enabled Nursing Future With no Documentation Burden: A Vision for a New Reality.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Acceptance of Electronic Medical Records Among Practitioner Nurses and Nurse Managers Using the UTAUT Framework in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Caring for Patients and Technological Competency in the Use of the Electronic Nursing Record System: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Identifying Bias at Scale in Clinical Notes Using Large Language Models.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- A Preliminary Conceptual Framework of Clinical Documentation Burden: Exploratory Factor Analysis Investigating Usability, Effort, and Perceived Burden among Health Care Providers.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesExamine electronic health record (EHR) use and factors contributing to documentation burden in acute and critical care nurses. MATERIALS AND
methodsA mixed-methods design was used guided by Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Key EHR components included, Flowsheets, Medication Administration Records (MAR), Care Plan, Notes, and Navigators. We first identified 5 units with the highest documentation burden in 1 university hospital through EHR log file analyses. Four nurses per unit were recruited and engaged in interviews and surveys designed to examine their perceptions of ease of use and usefulness of the 5 EHR components. A combination of inductive/deductive coding was used for qualitative data analysis.
resultsNurses acknowledged the importance of documentation for patient care, yet perceived the required documentation as burdensome with levels varying across the 5 components. Factors contributing to burden included non-EHR issues (patient-to-nurse staffing ratios; patient acuity; suboptimal time management) and EHR usability issues related to design/features. Flowsheets, Care Plan, and Navigators were found to be below acceptable usability and contributed to more burden compared to MAR and Notes. The most troublesome EHR usability issues were data redundancy, poor workflow navigation, and cumbersome data entry based on unit type. DISCUSSION: Overall, we used quantitative and qualitative data to highlight challenges with current nursing documentation features in the EHR that contribute to documentation burden. Differences in perceived usability across the EHR documentation components were driven by multiple factors, such as non-alignment with workflows and amount of duplication of prior data entries. Nurses offered several recommendations for improving the EHR, including minimizing redundant or excessive data entry requirements, providing visual cues (eg, clear error messages, highlighting areas where missing or incorrect information are), and integrating decision support.
conclusionOur study generated evidence for nurse EHR use and specific documentation usability issues contributing to burden. Findings can inform the development of solutions for enhancing multi-component EHR usability that accommodates the unique workflow of nurses. Documentation strategies designed to improve nurse working conditions should include non-EHR factors as they also contribute to documentation burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.