ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2024
An Integrated Experimental and Modeling Approach for Assessing High-Temperature Decomposition Kinetics of Explosives.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection and characterization of explosives and explosives residues: a review 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Tunable mechanics and energetics in structurally diverse TNPG-based metal organic networks.Chemical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a new integrated experimental and modeling effort that assesses the intrinsic sensitivity of energetic materials based on their reaction rates. The High Explosive Initiation Time (HEIT) experiment has been developed to provide a rapid assessment of the high-temperature reaction kinetics for the chemical decomposition of explosive materials. This effort is supported theoretically by quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) simulations that depict how different explosives can have vastly different adiabatic induction times at the same temperature. In this work, the ranking of explosive initiation properties between the HEIT experiment and QMD simulations is identical for six different energetic materials, even though they contain a variety of functional groups. We have also determined that the Arrhenius kinetics obtained by QMD simulations for homogeneous explosions connect remarkably well with those obtained from much longer duration one-dimensional time-to-explosion (ODTX) measurements. Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations have been developed to model the coupled heat transport and chemistry of the HEIT experiment to explicitly connect the experimental results with the Arrhenius rates for homogeneous explosions. These results confirm that ignition in the HEIT experiment is heterogeneous, where reactions start at the needle wall and propagate inward at a rate controlled by the thermal diffusivity and energy release. Overall, this work provides the first cohesive experimental and first-principles modeling effort to assess reaction kinetics of explosive chemical decomposition in the subshock regime and will be useful in predictive models needed for safety assessments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.