Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39259773›Full record

ReviewACS biomaterials science & engineering2024

Modifying Naturally Occurring, Nonmammalian-Sourced Biopolymers for Biomedical Applications.

Bryce D Shirk, Danielle L Heichel, Lauren E Eccles, Liam I Rodgers, Ali H Lateef, Kelly A Burke, Whitney L Stoppel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Self-Assembly ofIndustrial & engineering chemistry research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring the functional properties ofMaterials today. Communications · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bryce D ShirkJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1431-8653
Danielle L HeichelDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3222, United States.
Lauren E EcclesDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2378-1773
Liam I RodgersDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States.
Ali H LateefDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1426-6283
Kelly A BurkeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3222, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6741-0114
Whitney L StoppelJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7467-1737

Funding

Highly Tunable Brush-Like Polymer Architectures to Control Therapeutic Delivery and Cell-Material InteractionsR35GM146771 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI Kelly Anne Burke · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
Leveraging biodiversity and utilizing genetic engineering to expand the structure and function of silk fibroin biopolymers for biomedical applicationsR35GM147041 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Whitney L Stoppel · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146771NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM147041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural biopolymers have a rich history, with many uses across the fields of healthcare and medicine, including formulations for wound dressings, surgical implants, tissue culture substrates, and drug delivery vehicles. Yet, synthetic-based materials have been more successful in translation due to precise control and regulation achievable during manufacturing. However, there is a renewed interest in natural biopolymers, which offer a diverse landscape of architecture, sustainable sourcing, functional groups, and properties that synthetic counterparts cannot fully replicate as processing and sourcing of these materials has improved. Proteins and polysaccharides derived from various sources (crustaceans, plants, insects, etc.) are highlighted in this review. We discuss the common types of polysaccharide and protein biopolymers used in healthcare and medicine, highlighting methods and strategies to alter structures and intra- and interchain interactions to engineer specific functions, products, or materials. We focus on biopolymers obtained from natural, nonmammalian sources, including silk fibroins, alginates, chitosans, chitins, mucins, keratins, and resilins, while discussing strategies to improve upon their innate properties and sourcing standardization to expand their clinical uses and relevance. Emphasis will be placed on methods that preserve the structural integrity and native biological functions of the biopolymers and their makers. We will conclude by discussing the untapped potential of new technologies to manipulate native biopolymers while controlling their secondary and tertiary structures, offering a perspective on advancing biopolymer utility in novel applications within biomedical engineering, advanced manufacturing, and tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsAnimalsBiopolymersHumansPolysaccharidesTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsBiopolymersPolysaccharidesbiopolymerschemical modificationgenetic engineeringnatural products

Identifiers

PMID39259773
PMCPMC12109709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.