Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39259620›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2024

Preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain by means of long-acting progestogen therapy: the PRE-EMPT RCT.

Kevin G Cooper, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Jane P Daniels, Versha Cheed, Laura Gennard, Lisa Leighton, Danielle Pirie, Melyda Melyda, Mark Monahan, Annalise Weckesser and 12 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Progestagens for pain symptoms associated with endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Kevin G CooperDepartment of Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-0071
Siladitya BhattacharyaSchool of Medicine Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4588-356X
Jane P DanielsNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3324-6771
Versha CheedBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6713-0913
Laura GennardBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-6061-041X
Lisa LeightonBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-2398-6816
Danielle PirieDepartment of Gynaecology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-6785-4371
Melyda MelydaHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-4910
Mark MonahanHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1175-9421
Annalise WeckesserCentre for Health and Social Care Research, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1468-5464
Tracy RobertsHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0624-0537
Elaine DennyFaculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8118-4301
Laura OcanseyBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-7139-7008
Clive StubbsBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2690-6583
Emma CoxEndometriosis UK, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-5106-378X
Georgina JonesSchool of Humanities and Social Science, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5267-1776
T Justin ClarkDepartment of Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5943-1062
Ertan SaridoganElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London Women's Health Division, University College London Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9736-4107
Janesh K GuptaInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3052-8423
Hilary Om CritchleyMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1913-4044
Andrew HorneMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9656-493X
Lee J MiddletonBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4621-1922

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis affects 1 in 10 women, many of whom have surgery for persistent pain. Recurrence of symptoms following an operation is common. Although hormonal treatment can reduce this risk, there is uncertainty about the best option. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of long-acting progestogen therapy compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain and quality of life. Design: A multicentre, open, randomised trial with parallel economic evaluation. The final design was informed by a pilot study, qualitative exploration of women's lived experience of endometriosis and a pretrial economic model. Setting: Thirty-four United Kingdom hospitals. Participants: Women of reproductive age undergoing conservative surgery for endometriosis. Interventions: Long-acting progestogen reversible contraceptive (either 150 mg depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) or combined oral contraceptive pill (30 µg ethinylestradiol, 150 µg levonorgestrel). Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 questionnaire at 36 months post randomisation. The economic evaluation estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained. Results: Four hundred and five women were randomised to receive either long-acting reversible contraceptive ( Limitations: Limitations include the absence of a no-treatment group and the fact that many women changed treatments over the 3 years of follow-up. Use of telephone follow-up to collect primary outcome data in those who failed to return questionnaires resulted in missing data for secondary outcomes. The COVID pandemic may have affected rates of further surgical treatment. Conclusions: At 36 months, women allocated to either intervention had comparable levels of pain, with both groups showing around a 40% improvement from presurgical levels. Although the combined oral contraceptive was cost-effective at a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the difference between the two was marginal and lower rates of repeat surgery might make long-acting reversible contraceptives preferable to some women. Future work: Future research needs to focus on evaluating newer hormonal preparations, a more holistic approach to symptom suppression and identification of biomarkers to diagnose endometriosis and its recurrence. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN97865475. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN97865475. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 11/114/01) and is published in full in

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEndometriosisQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeAdultContraceptives, Oral, CombinedFemaleHumansIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetatePelvic PainProgestinsSecondary PreventionUnited KingdomYoung AdultContraceptives, Oral, CombinedLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetateProgestinsCOMBINED ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE PILLCOST-BENEFIT ANALYSISDEPO MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATEENDOMETRIOSISFEMALE CONTRACEPTIVESHEALTH CARELEVONORGESTREL IUSLONG-ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTIVEOUTCOME ASSESSMENTPELVIC PAINPILOT PROJECTSQUALITY OF LIFERANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Identifiers

PMID39259620
PMCPMC11417646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.