ArticleJAMA2024
Telehealth vs In-Person Early Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03375489 (Comparative Effectiveness of Early Integrated Telehealth Versus In-Person Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Effectiveness of Early Integrated Telehealth Versus In-Person Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Digital Health Interventions on Symptom Management and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients Undergoing Systemic Therapy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of and implementation requirements for telehealth in palliative care patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Palliative medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Telehealth in palliative care settings: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature.Palliative medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Palliative care interventions for thoracic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis identifying the core elements.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- How is Telehealth Used to Increase Access to Specialty Palliative Care? A Systematic Review.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of a Symptom Surveillance and Collaborative Care Intervention on Palliative Care Utilization.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2026Trial
- "We Talk About Everything": Experiences with Digital Health Communication in Palliative Care.Journal of palliative medicine · 2026Article
- Trends in Telehealth Use and Changes in Associated Disparities: 2022-2024 HINTS.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Communication Quality in Tele-Palliative Care.Journal of palliative medicine · 2026Article
- Safeguarding palliative and serious illness care in America.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Integrating care across the life course supports goal-aligned end-of-life care.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Digital health in palliative care: use is largely limited to conventional technologies - a cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Communication practices and experience of connection in telehealth serious illness conversations with rural cancer patients: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of a rural palliative care intervention for patients with heart failure (RuPAL-HF).BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Digital health technology in oncology: results from a survey by the ESMO Young Oncologists Committee and medical student alumni.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Addressing the critical palliative care gaps in ethnic minority regions of low- and middle-income countries: a focus group study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- "If I have any problems, I just want to see my [primary care] doctor": perspectives on a proposed collaborative RUral PALliative care intervention (RuPal).BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- SPICT as a predictive tool for outcomes of 1-year in patients with neurological disorders: a cohort study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Approaching Serious Illness Conversations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Using Telehealth: A Practical Guide.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2026Review
- Comparing audiovisual visit and in-person visit note quality.JAMIA open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Numerous studies show that early palliative care improves quality of life and other key outcomes in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers, although most lack access to this evidence-based model of care. Objective: To evaluate whether delivering early palliative care via secure video vs in-person visits has an equivalent effect on quality of life in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, multisite, comparative effectiveness trial from June 14, 2018, to May 4, 2023, at 22 US cancer centers among 1250 patients within 12 weeks of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC and 548 caregivers. Intervention: Participants were randomized to meet with a specialty-trained palliative care clinician every 4 weeks either via video visit or in person in the outpatient clinic from the time of enrollment and throughout the course of disease. The video visit group had an initial in-person visit to establish rapport, followed by subsequent virtual visits. Main Outcomes and Measures: Equivalence of the effect of video visit vs in-person early palliative care on quality of life at week 24 per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung questionnaire (equivalence margin of ±4 points; score range: 0-136, with higher scores indicating better quality of life). Participants completed study questionnaires at enrollment and at weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48. Results: By 24 weeks, participants (mean age, 65.5 years; 54.0% women; 82.7% White) had a mean of 4.7 (video) and 4.9 (in-person) early palliative care encounters. Patient-reported quality-of-life scores were equivalent between groups (video mean, 99.7 vs in-person mean, 97.7; difference, 2.0 [90% CI, 0.1-3.9]; P = .04 for equivalence). Rate of caregiver participation in visits was lower for video vs in-person early palliative care (36.6% vs 49.7%; P < .001). Study groups did not differ in caregiver quality of life, patient coping, or patient and caregiver satisfaction with care, mood symptoms, or prognostic perceptions. Conclusions and Relevance: The delivery of early palliative care virtually vs in person demonstrated equivalent effects on quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC, underscoring the considerable potential for improving access to this evidence-based care model through telehealth delivery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03375489.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.