Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39259542›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Open-Label Placebo Injection for Chronic Back Pain With Functional Neuroimaging: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yoni K Ashar, Michael Sun, Karen Knight, Thomas F Flood, Zachary Anderson, Ted J Kaptchuk, Tor D Wager

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03294148 (Mind-body Treatments for Chronic Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03294148 nacompletednot on this map

Mind-body Treatments for Chronic Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, BoulderRan2017 to 2019Enrolled151ConditionsChronic Pain, Back Pain Lower Back Chronic, Back Pain, LowArmsOpen-Label Placebo Treatment for Chronic Back Pain, Psychotherapy Treatment for Chronic Back Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Methodologic challenges of patient reported outcome research: A systematic review of the treatment of cancer related fatigue with open label placebos and the trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on open-label placebo responses.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The mind-bending power of placebo.Nature medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoni K AsharDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Michael SunDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Karen KnightPanorama Orthopedics and Spine Center, Golden, Colorado.
Thomas F FloodDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Zachary AndersonDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Ted J KaptchukBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tor D WagerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.

Funding

The Neural Bases of Placebo Effects and their Relation to Regulatory ProcessesR01MH076136 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WAGER, TOR D. · 2007 to 2023
$8.5M
J. NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002386 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Genevieve Giny Fouda Amou ou · 2017 to 2026
$5.8M
fMRI-based Biomarkers for Multiple Components of PainR01DA035484 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WAGER, TOR D. · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
Impact of Theory of Mind Training on Brain-to-Brain Patient-Clinician ConcordanceR01AT012144 · NCCIH · SPAULDING REHABILITATION HOSPITAL · PI ROBERT R EDWARDS, VITALY NAPADOW · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
The neural bases of placebo effects and their relation to regulatory processesR37MH076136 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TOR D. WAGER · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002386NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT012144NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035484NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076136NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH076136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Chronic back pain (CBP) is a leading cause of disability. Placebo treatments often provide as much pain relief as bona fide treatments, such as steroid injections. Open-label (honestly prescribed) placebos (OLPs) may relieve CBP without deception, but OLP mechanisms remain poorly understood. Objective: To investigate the long-term efficacy and neurobiological mechanisms of OLP for CBP. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial of CBP with longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) comparing OLP with usual care, with 1-year follow-up, was conducted in a university research setting and a community orthopedic clinic. Participants were individuals aged 21 to 70 years with CBP. The trial was conducted from November 2017 to August 2018, with 1-year follow-up completed by November 2019. Data analysis was performed from April 2020 to May 2024. The primary analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat sample. Interventions: Participants randomized to OLP received a 1-time subcutaneous lumbar saline injection presented as placebo accompanied by information about the power of placebo to relieve pain, alongside their ongoing care. Usual care participants continued their ongoing care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was pain intensity (0-10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 the most intense) at 1 month posttreatment. Secondary outcomes included pain interference, depression, anxiety, anger, and sleep quality. Functional MRI was performed before and after treatment during evoked and spontaneous back pain. Results: A total of 101 adults (52 [51.4%] females; mean [SD] age, 40.4 [15.4] years) with moderate severity CBP (mean [SD], 4.10 [1.25] intensity; duration, 9.7 [8.5] years) were enrolled. Compared with usual care, OLP reduced CBP intensity posttreatment (relative reduction, 0.61; Hedges g = 0.45; 95% CI, -0.89 to 0.04; P = .02). Through 1-year follow-up, pain relief did not persist, although significant benefits were observed for depression, anger, anxiety, and sleep disruption (Hedges g = 0.3-0.5; all P < .03). Brain responses to evoked back pain for OLP vs usual care increased in rostral anterior cingulate and ventromedial prefrontal cortex and decreased in somatomotor cortices and thalamus. During spontaneous pain, functional connectivity analyses identified OLP vs usual care increases in ventromedial prefrontal cortex connectivity to the rostral ventral medulla, a pain-modulatory brainstem nucleus. No adverse effects of treatment were reported by participants. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of OLP vs usual care, a single nondeceptive placebo injection reduced CBP intensity for 1 month posttreatment and provided benefits lasting for at least 1 year posttreatment. Brain mechanisms of OLP in a clinical population overlap with those of deceptive placebos in healthy volunteers, including engagement of prefrontal-brainstem pain modulatory pathways. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03294148.

Indexed as

Back PainChronic PainFunctional NeuroimagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPlacebosTreatment OutcomePlacebos

Identifiers

PMID39259542
PMCPMC11391328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.