ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024
Functional conductivity imaging: quantitative mapping of brain activity.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Applications of Electrical Conductivity Imaging Using MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Review
- Deep generative computed perfusion-deficit mapping of ischaemic stroke.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Electrical properties basedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Effect of Ethanol on Brain Electrical Tissue Conductivity in Social Drinkers.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Theory and modelling suggest that detection of neuronal activity may be feasible using phase sensitive MRI methods. Successful detection of neuronal activity both in vitro and in vivo has been described while others have reported negative results. Magnetic resonance electrical properties tomography may be a route by which signal changes can be identified. Here, we report successful and repeatable detection at 3 Tesla of human brain activation in response to visual and somatosensory stimuli using a functional version of tissue conductivity imaging (funCI). This detects activation in both white and grey matter with apparent tissue conductivity changes of 0.1 S/m (17-20%, depending on the tissue baseline conductivity measure) allowing visualization of complete system circuitry. The degree of activation scales with the degree of the stimulus (duration or contrast). The conductivity response functions show a distinct timecourse from that of traditional fMRI haemodynamic (BOLD or Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent) response functions, peaking within milliseconds of stimulus cessation and returning to baseline within 3-4 s. We demonstrate the utility of the funCI approach by showing robust activation of the lateral somatosensory circuitry on stimulation of an index finger, on stimulation of a big toe or of noxious (heat) stimulation of the face as well as activation of visual circuitry on visual stimulation in up to five different individuals. The sensitivity and repeatability of this approach provides further evidence that magnetic resonance imaging approaches can detect brain activation beyond changes in blood supply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.