Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39259388›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Using machine learning methods to investigate the impact of age on the causes of death in patients with early intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgery.

Shiqin Song, Shixiong Song, Huarong Zhao, Shike Huang, Xinghua Xiao, Xiaobo Lv, Yuehong Deng, Yiyin Tao, Yanlin Liu, Ke Su and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shiqin Song *Department of Oncology, Hejiang County People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Shixiong Song *Department of Anesthesiology, Guangyuan Central Hospital, Guangyuan, Sichuan, China.
Huarong ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, Hejiang County People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Shike HuangDepartment of Oncology, Hejiang County People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Xinghua XiaoDepartment of Oncology, Hejiang County People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Xiaobo LvDepartment of Oncology, Hejiang County People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Yuehong DengDepartment of Oncology, Hejiang County People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Yiyin TaoDepartment of Oncology, Hejiang County People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Yanlin LiuDepartment of Oncology, Hejiang County People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Ke SuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Shansha ChengDepartment of Oncology, Hejiang County People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan, China. CSSHJX1@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7948-6335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of age on the causes of death (CODs) in patients with early-stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) who had undergone surgery was analyzed in this study.

methodsA total of 1555 patients (885 in the older group and 670 in the younger group) were included in this study. Before and after applying inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), the different CODs in the 2 groups were further investigated. Additionally, 7 different machine learning models were used as predictive tools to identify key variables, aiming to evaluate the therapeutic outcome in early ICC patients undergoing surgery.

resultsBefore (5.92 vs. 4.08 years, P < 0.001) and after (6.00 vs. 4.08 years, P < 0.001) IPTW, the younger group consistently showed longer overall survival (OS) compared with the older group. Before IPTW, there were no significant differences in cholangiocarcinoma-related deaths (CRDs, P = 0.7) and secondary malignant neoplasms (SMNs, P = 0.78) between the 2 groups. However, the younger group had a lower cumulative incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD, P = 0.006) and other causes (P < 0.001) compared with the older group. After IPTW, there were no differences between the 2 groups in CRDs (P = 0.2), SMNs (P = 0.7), and CVD (P = 0.1). However, the younger group had a lower cumulative incidence of other CODs compared with the older group (P < 0.001). The random forest (RF) model showed the highest C-index of 0.703. Time-dependent variable importance bar plots showed that age was the most important factor affecting the 2-, 4-, and 6-year survival, followed by stage and size.

conclusionsOur study confirmed that younger patients have longer OS compared with older patients. Further analysis of the CODs indicated that older patients are more likely to die from CVDs. The RF model demonstrated the best predictive performance and identified age as the most important factor affecting OS in early ICC patients undergoing surgery.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaMachine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCause of DeathFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateAgeCause of deathIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaMachine learning modelsSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.