ReviewJournal of molecular evolution2024
On the Nature of the Last Common Ancestor: A Story from its Translation Machinery.
Review in Journal of molecular evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Horizontal transfer of post-translational modifiers brings evolutionary opportunity and challenges to a conserved translation factor.BMC biology · 2026Article
- A new LUCApedia database for data-driven research on early evolutionary history.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Before LUCA: unearthing the chemical roots of metabolism.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Mysteries of Sleep: Exploring Phylogenomic Sleep Signals in the Recently Characterized Archaeal Phylum Lokiarchaeota near Loki's Castle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Last Common Ancestor (LCA) is understood as a hypothetical population of organisms from which all extant living creatures are thought to have descended. Its biology and environment have been and continue to be the subject of discussions within the scientific community. Since the first bacterial genomes were obtained, multiple attempts to reconstruct the genetic content of the LCA have been made. In this review, we compare 10 of the most extensive reconstructions of the gene content possessed by the LCA as they relate to aspects of the translation machinery. Although each reconstruction has its own methodological biases and many disagree in the metabolic nature of the LCA all, to some extent, indicate that several components of the translation machinery are among the most conserved genetic elements. The datasets from each reconstruction clearly show that the LCA already had a largely complete translational system with a genetic code already in place and therefore was not a progenote. Among these features several ribosomal proteins, transcription factors like IF2, EF-G, and EF-Tu and both class I and class II aminoacyl tRNA synthetases were found in essentially all reconstructions. Due to the limitations of the various methodologies, some features such as the occurrence of rRNA posttranscriptional modified bases are not fully addressed. However, conserved as it is, non-universal ribosomal features found in various reconstructions indicate that LCA's translation machinery was still evolving, thereby acquiring the domain specific features in the process. Although progenotes from the pre-LCA likely no longer exist recent results obtained by unraveling the early history of the ribosome and other genetic processes can provide insight to the nature of the pre-LCA world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39259330What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.