SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Classification of hallux valgus deformity-is there a standard?
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- All-suture anchor-enhanced capsulorrhaphy versus simple longitudinal capsulorrhaphy combined with Chevron-Akin osteotomy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe hallux valgus: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Correction of Juvenile Hallux Valgus and Flexible Flatfoot in Children: Outcomes of Combined First Metatarsal Hemiepiphysiodesis and Calcaneal-Stop Procedure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Hallux Valgus: Prevalence and Treatment Options.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Article
- Biomechanical comparison of five fixation methods in minimally invasive hallux valgus osteotomy: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHallux valgus deformity severity is one determent for the surgical procedure for hallux valgus (HV) correction. HV deformities are usually classified into mild/moderate/severe. The aim was to investigate the cut-off criteria used to classify HV deformity. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was based on a previous living systematic review. Four common databases were searched for the last decade. All review-steps were conducted by two reviewers. Data assessed were the individual cut-off values used to classify HV deformity into mild/moderate/severe, and the referenced classification systems.
results46 studies were included. 21/18 studies grade deformity based on the intermetatarsal angle (IMA)/ hallux valgus angle (HVA) with great heterogeneity throughout the different cut-off values. The most referenced classification systems were the Coughlin and Mann's and the Robinson classification.
conclusionsThe currently used classification systems are heterogenic, and no standard could be defined. The community should define a uniform classification system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.