Trial reportAIDS and behavior2025
Effect of a Male-Targeted Digital Decision Support Application Aimed at Increasing Linkage to HIV Care Among Men: Findings from the HITS Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial in Rural South Africa.
Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03757104 (Home-based Interventions to Test and Start), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Home-based Interventions to Test and Start (HITS): a Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Mortality and Incidence Through HIV Treatment
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A conceptual framework for integrating HIV, STIs and pregnancy prevention services in Vhembe District, Limpopo, South Africa: improving teenagers' health outcomes.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Creating a Usable and Effective Digital Intervention to Support Men to Test for HIV and Link to Care in A Resource-Constrained Setting: Iterative Design Based on A Person-Based Approach and Human Computer Interaction Methods.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of differentiated care models that incorporate economic strengthening for HIV antiretroviral therapy adherence: a systematic review.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Linkage to HIV care remains suboptimal among men. We investigated the effectiveness of a male-targeted HIV-specific decision support app, Empowering People through Informed Choices for HIV (EPIC-HIV), on increasing linkage to HIV care among men in rural South Africa. Home-Based Intervention to Test and Start (HITS) was a multi-component cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted among 45 communities in uMkhanyakude, KwaZulu-Natal. The development of EPIC-HIV was guided by self-determination theory and human-computer interaction design to increase intrinsic motivation to seek HIV testing and care among men. EPIC-HIV was offered in two stages: EPIC-HIV 1 at the time of home-based HIV counseling and testing (HBHCT), and EPIC-HIV 2 at 1 month after a positive HIV diagnosis if not linked to care. Sixteen communities were randomly assigned to the arms to receive EPIC-HIV, and 29 communities to the arms without EPIC-HIV. Among all eligible men, we compared linkage to care (initiation or resumption of antiretroviral therapy after > 3 months of care interruption) at local clinics within 1 year of a home visit, ascertained from individual clinical records. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed using modified Poisson regression with adjustment for receiving another intervention (i.e., financial incentives) and clustering at the community level. We also conducted a satisfaction survey for EPIC-HIV 2. A total of 13,894 men were eligible (i.e., aged ≥ 15 years and resident in the 45 communities). The mean age was 34.6 (±16.8) years, and 65% were married or in an informal union. Overall, 20.7% received HBHCT, resulting in 122 HIV-positive and 6 discordant tests. Among these, 54 men linked to care within 1 year after HBHCT. Additionally, of the 13,765 eligible participants who did not receive HBHCT or received HIV-negative results, 301 men linked to care within 1 year. Overall, only 13 men received EPIC-HIV 2. The proportion of linkage to care did not differ between the arms randomized to EPIC-HIV and those without EPIC-HIV (adjusted risk ratio = 1.05; 95% CI:0.86-1.29). All 13 men who used EPIC-HIV 2 reported the app was acceptable, user-friendly, and useful for getting information on HIV testing and treatment. The reach was low, although the acceptability and usability of the app were very high among those who engaged with it. Enhanced digital support applications could form part of interventions to increase knowledge of HIV treatment among men. Clinical Trial Number: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT03757104.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39259239What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.