Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39259227›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025

EANM position paper on challenges and opportunities of full-ring 360° CZT bone imaging: it's time to let go of planar whole-body bone imaging.

Richard Graham, David Morland, Sarah Cade, Laetitia Imbert, Emmanouil Panagiotidis, Jens Kurth, Frédéric Paycha, Tim Van den Wyngaert

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantification in bone SPECT/CT.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard GrahamDepartment of Radiology, Royal United Hopital, Bath, UK.
David MorlandDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jean-Godinot, Reims, France.
Sarah CadeDepartment of Medical Physics, Royal United Hopital, Bath, UK.
Laetitia ImbertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy, Université de Lorraine, IADI, INSERM U1254, Nancy, France.
Emmanouil PanagiotidisPET/CT Oncology Center 'Theageneio', Thessaloniki, Greece.
Jens KurthDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany. jens.kurth@med.uni-rostock.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6864-4513
Frédéric PaychaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Tim Van den WyngaertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of smaller footprint, more sensitive Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride (CZT)-based detectors with improved spatial and energy resolution has enabled the design of innovative full-ring 360° CZT SPECT/CT systems (e.g., VERITON

Indexed as

Bone and BonesCadmiumNuclear MedicineSingle Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed TomographyTelluriumWhole Body ImagingZincHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCadmiumCdZnTeTelluriumZinc360° SPECT/CTBone scintigraphyCadmium-Zinc-TellurideCZTRing geometry

Identifiers

PMID39259227
PMCPMC11754384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.