Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39259028›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2025

Parental magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of fetuses with brain anomalies.

Stephanie Libzon, Michal Gafner, Dorit Lev, Nilly Waiserberg, Liat Gindes, Zvi Leibovitz, Liat Ben-Sira, Tally Lerman-Sagie

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prenatal evaluation, diagnosis and management of fetal corpus callosal abnormalities: international Delphi consensus.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie Libzon *Multidisciplinary Fetal Neurology Center, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4706-1949
Michal Gafner *Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3851-7334
Dorit LevMultidisciplinary Fetal Neurology Center, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.
Nilly WaiserbergDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6175-8649
Liat GindesMultidisciplinary Fetal Neurology Center, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7827-1922
Zvi LeibovitzFaculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Liat Ben-SiraFaculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0827-0190
Tally Lerman-SagieMultidisciplinary Fetal Neurology Center, Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the role of parental magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing fetuses with suspected brain anomalies and its use in prenatal counselling.

methodA retrospective, multicentre chart review was conducted on fetuses who underwent brain MRI because of suspected brain abnormalities between January 2008 and December 2022, with one or both parents who underwent brain MRI (MRI-Trio) as part of prenatal counselling. Clinical and demographic data were collected, including fetal and parental MRI findings, prenatal counselling outcomes, genetic testing results, family and previous pregnancy history, neurological examinations of the born children up to 24 months of age, and autopsy reports of fetuses from terminated pregnancies. MRI-Trio concordance was defined as at least one abnormal brain feature identified with similarity in the fetus and the parents. The live-born children were assessed postnatally through either neurodevelopmental evaluations or telephone interviews.

resultsSixty pregnancies were included (41.7% with concordant and 58.3% with discordant MRI-Trio). Forty-two children were born (70%) and 17 pregnancies were terminated (28.3%). One case of in utero fetal death (1.7%) was reported. The most common brain findings were multiple anomalies (n = 26, 43.3%), isolated disorders of the corpus callosum (n = 17, 28.3%), atypical periventricular pseudocysts (n = 6, 10%), and anomalies of the anterior complex (n = 4, 6.7%). MRI-Trio enabled better prognostication. When MRI-Trio was concordant, counselling was more favourable (n = 22, 36.6%) and the majority of live-born children exhibited typical development (p < 0.001).

interpretationMRI-Trio is a valuable tool for identifying dominantly inherited brain anomalies that may not hold developmental significance or are associated with favourable outcomes, acknowledging the potential for variable penetrance, which may result in more severe presentations. Concordant MRI-Trio findings can enhance the accuracy of prenatal counselling, potentially reducing the incidence of termination of pregnancy.

Indexed as

BrainFetusMagnetic Resonance ImagingNervous System MalformationsParentsPrenatal DiagnosisAdultFemaleHumansMalePregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39259028
PMCPMC11875520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.