SynthesisAnnals of medicine2024
The effectiveness of targeted therapy for recurrence or metastasis adenoid cystic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A case report of adenoid cystic carcinoma combined with giant renal metastasis treated with robotic surgery.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Molecular genetic profiling of a rare case of primary pulmonary adenoid cystic carcinoma: Insights from whole exome sequencing and literature review.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2025Article
- Multiline treatment of primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma with multiple metastases: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeSeveral clinical studies have demonstrated the potential of molecular-targeted agents for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (R/M ACC). However, there is currently no consensus regarding the efficacy of molecular-targeted agents for patients with R/M ACC. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of molecular-targeted agents in patients with R/M ACC and provide insights to guide clinical decision-making. MATERIALS AND
methodsFive databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ProQuest, and Scopus) were searched based on the search strategy and selection criteria. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), metastatic sites, and adverse events (AE). Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis.
resultsFinally, 28 studies, involving 849 patients, were included. The most common metastatic sites were the lungs, bones, liver, lymph nodes, and kidneys. The pooled ORR was 4.0% (95% CI, 0.7-8.8%), the pooled DCR was 80.5% (95% CI, 72.2%-87.7%). Compared with other-target drugs, multiple kinase inhibitors (MKIs) improved the ORR (pooled ORR for single-target drugs vs. MKIs: 5.9% vs. 0%). The combination of MKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) had a significantly higher ORR (17.9% in the axitinib + avelumab group). The pooled median PFS and OS were 8.35 and 25.62 months, respectively. MKIs improved the median PFS compared to other-target drugs (9.43 months vs 5.06 months). In addition, the most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (51.6%), hypertension (44.2%), and nausea (40.0%), followed by hand-foot skin syndrome (36.8%), diarrhoea (34.4%), weight loss (34.2%), anorexia (31.8%), rash (31.7%), and headache (29.0%).
conclusionThe findings of this study suggest that MKIs have a better therapeutic efficacy than single-target drugs in patients with R/M ACC. Future studies are warranted to verify the synergistic role of the combination strategy of MKIs plus ICIs, given the limited number of studies on this topic conducted and published to date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.