Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39258833›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

Experiences and Fundamental Care Needs in Patients With Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumours-An Interview Study in a Surgical Context.

Frida Olsson, Eva Jangland, Katarina Edfeldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frida OlssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1552-3711
Eva JanglandDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6888-3792
Katarina EdfeldtDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7366-6258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe study aimed to describe patients' fundamental care needs and their experiences of nursing care, throughout surgical treatment of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours.

designA qualitative descriptive study was performed.

methodsPatients' interviews (n = 19) were conducted in Sweden from May 2021 to January 2022 and analysed using directed qualitative content analysis guided by the Fundamentals of Care framework.

resultsThe results are presented in three descriptive categories chronologically throughout the care chain. In the preoperative phase of care, the category was 'Feeling safe but lonely and frightened, and struggling with existential thoughts'; experiences in the postoperative phase of care resulted in the category 'Feeling cared for but suffering from physical symptoms and feelings of loneliness'; and the category in the discharge phase was 'Lacking self-care information and feeling worried about the future'.

conclusionThere were deficiencies in the delivery of fundamental care for patients with a rare tumour diagnosis throughout surgical treatment. Nursing care is mostly task focused and fragmented, and there is a lack of psychosocial and relational care across the care chain. Registered nurses and nursing managers need to take responsibility for their leadership in nursing care to fulfil patients' fundamental care needs. The Fundamentals of Care framework could be used for work improvements to include all aspects of nursing care. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: High-quality nursing care is needed throughout the care chain, including self-care after discharge, for patients with this rare tumour diagnosis. A higher awareness of patients' experiences and the importance of psychosocial support is warranted. Registered nurses and nursing managers must revise and improve routines to support patients' psychosocial needs. Registered nurses need to take responsibility for their leadership in nursing care to fulfil patients' fundamental care needs. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? This study highlights patients' fundamental care needs and experiences of nursing care throughout surgical treatment of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours. What were the main findings? There are deficiencies in fulfilling patients' fundamental care needs across the care chain and in all dimensions of the Fundamental of Care framework throughout surgical treatment of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours. Patients struggled with loneliness and existential thoughts, as well as worries about the future. Patients experienced a lack of information about plans for the day, self-care, and follow-ups. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? For clinicians to develop an understanding of, and improve, fundamental care needs for patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours in a surgical context. For registered nurses to understand the importance of their leadership and nursing responsibility to fulfil fundamental care needs. REPORTING

methodThe consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: The patients shared their experiences during the interviews, which has contributed to a deeper knowledge and understanding of the phenomena under study.

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsIntestine, SmallNeuroendocrine TumorsNursing CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSwedenFundamentals of Carenursing carepatient experiencequalitative methodsmall intestinal neuroendocrine tumourssurgical nursing

Identifiers

PMID39258833
PMCPMC11896833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.