ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2024
Electrophysiological correlates of divergent projections in the avian superior olivary nucleus.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innervation Pattern of Inhibitory Projection Neurons in the Bird Sound Localization Circuit.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026Article
- Inhibitory inputs to avian ITD circuits.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The physiological diversity of inhibitory neurons provides ample opportunity to influence a wide range of computational roles through their varied activity patterns, especially via feedback loops. In the avian auditory brain stem, inhibition originates primarily from the superior olivary nucleus (SON), and so it is critical to understand the intrinsic physiological properties and processing capabilities of these neurons. Neurons in the SON receive ascending input via the cochlear nuclei: directly from the intensity-coding cochlear nucleus angularis (NA) and indirectly via the interaural timing nucleus laminaris (NL), which itself receives input from cochlear nucleus magnocellularis (NM). Two distinct populations of SON neurons provide inhibitory feedback either to ipsilateral NA, NL, and the timing cochlear nucleus NM or to the contralateral SON. To determine whether these populations correspond to distinct response types, we investigated their electrophysiology in brain stem slices, using patch-clamp electrophysiology. We identified three phenotypes: single-spiking, chattering tonic, and regular tonic neurons. The two tonic phenotypes displayed distinct firing patterns and different membrane properties. Fluctuating "noisy" currents used to probe the capability of SON neurons to encode temporal features showed that each phenotype differed in sensitivity to temporally modulated input. By using cell fills and anatomical reconstructions, we could correlate the firing phenotypes with their axonal projection patterns. We found that SON axons exited via three fiber tracts, with each tract composed of specific phenotypes. These results provide a basis for understanding the role of specific inhibitory cell types in auditory function and elucidate the organization of the SON outputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.