ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2024
Comparative analysis of hydrophobicity and dentin adhesion ability in Candida albicans strains.
Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAdhesion to dentin is a first step for a successful microbial root canal colonization. Cell hydrophobicity seems to have some influence in the Candida species adhesion to surfaces. To measure cell surface hydrophobicity and to investigate the adherence ability to human dentin among Candida albicans strains isolated from root canal and lingual dorsum via an in vitro study. METHODOLOGY: adhesion was quantified in function of dentin area covered by blastospores and/or hyphae presence detected by epifluorescence microscope. Cell surface hydrophobicity was estimated by assessing the percentage migration of cells from an aqueous phase to a hydrocarbon phase. Contact angles were measured by the sessile drop technique on the dentin surface using a contact angle measurements apparatus. We also examined the correlation between adhesion ability and hydrophobicity.
resultsalthough there was some intra-species variation in cell surface hydrophobicity, most isolates were characterized by moderate hydrophobicity. There was no significant difference in this parameter when the isolation niche was considered. Both root canal and lingual dorsum yeasts were able to adhere to dentin. No association was found between the strains' site of isolation and adhesion. Moreover, cell surface hydrophobicity and adhesion ability were not correlated.
conclusionalthough hydrophobicity can influence Candida albicans virulence in many ways, this study suggests that this parameter by itself was not a good predictor of adhesion to dentin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.