Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39258468›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Psychometric analysis and validation of the SF-34 PREG: An adaptation of the SF-36 for assessing quality of life in pregnant women.

Cristian Martín-Vázquez, Jose David Urchaga-Litago, Rubén García-Fernández, Natalia Calvo-Ayuso, Laura Rosón-Matilla, Cristina Liébana-Presa

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Psychometric analysis and validation of the SF-34 PREG: An adaptation of the SF-36 for assessing quality of life in pregnant women.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristian Martín-VázquezDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Campus de Ponferrada, Universidad de León, Ponferrada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2232-8918
Jose David Urchaga-LitagoFaculty of Communication, Pontifical University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6624-070X
Rubén García-FernándezDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Campus de Ponferrada, Universidad de León, Ponferrada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6745-6190
Natalia Calvo-AyusoDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Campus de Ponferrada, Universidad de León, Ponferrada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2958-6722
Laura Rosón-MatillaMaternity service, "El Bierzo" University Hospital, Ponferrada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3272-6470
Cristina Liébana-PresaDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Campus de Ponferrada, Universidad de León, Ponferrada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1272-3014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to perform a psychometric analysis of the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) in a population of pregnant women and validate an adapted version of the instrument to measure health-related quality of life specific to pregnancy.

methodsA cross-sectional study design was carried out with data collection between 7 and 36 weeks of gestation, with a total sample of 547 pregnant women divided into two randomized subsamples. Data were collected between September 2021 and April 2023. An exploratory factor analysis was initially performed on one subsample, followed by a confirmatory factor analysis on the other. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega, and correlations between factors were analyzed.

resultsResults from the exploratory factor analysis proposed a seven-factor model explaining 56% of the variance. All proposed dimensions achieved Cronbach's alpha scores above 0.75, with a total test score of 0.92. Furthermore, all dimensions exhibited positive and statistically significant correlations. Bartlett's test of sphericity and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test yielded values of 5599 (P < 0.001) and 0.871, respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis reaffirmed this model with good fit indices: χ

conclusionThis study developed and validated the "SF-34 PREG," an adapted version of the SF-36, specifically designed for pregnant women. The SF-34 PREG demonstrated high reliability and a robust factorial structure, making it a more precise and relevant tool for assessing health-related quality of life during pregnancy. Although it does not include the social functioning dimension of the original SF-36, the SF-34 PREG offers improved relevance and accuracy for this specific population. Further research and clinical use of the SF-34 PREG are recommended.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeoplePsychometricsQuality of LifeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHRQOLmidwiferypregnancyquality of lifeSF‐36validation study

Identifiers

PMID39258468
PMCPMC11726142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.